Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
Published on: December 19, 2020
SU-C-218-06: Evaluation of a CT-Based, Semi-Automated Lung Mass Estimation Method Under Varying Acquisition
Purpose:
To evaluate a simple, semi-automated lung mass estimation method on CT scans from a variety of acquisition techniques for mass correction of MIRD dose estimates.
Methods:
CT scans from ten patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning on a GE DST PET/CT scanner were analyzed retrospectively. For each patient, free- breathing (FB) and respiratory gated 4D-CT scans were acquired. 4D-CT scans were reconstructed and sorted into ten phases representing one complete respiratory cycle. An average CT (ACT) was derived from the ten phase reconstructions. Half the patients also had breath-hold (BH) scans. Scans were analyzed using Osirix MD's V 1.3 (Pixmeo, Geneva Switzerland) Grow Region segmentation tool. Lung volume; average lung, tissue (∼lcm ROI in the descending aorta), and air (∼1 cm ROI in the trachea) HU's were recorded for each acquisition type. Lung mass was calculated by assuming each voxel is a linear combination of only air and tissue. The fraction of total lung volume consisting of lung tissue is assumed to be (lung HU - air HU) / (tissue HU - air HU), and mass = total volume X fraction X 1 g/cm3 .
Results:
4D-CT mass estimates showed variability, with a minimum at end-expiration and a maximum just after end-inspiration. ACT generally produced the highest estimate. FB and BH estimates were near the median.
Conclusions:
Although calculated mass increased with increasing total lung volume, the difference between minimum and maximum population means in the 4D-CT data was 5.5%. FB and BH estimates fell within that 5.5%, while the ACT mean was 9.8% above the global mean. The range of estimated masses (524 g to 977 g) suggests the value of lung mass estimates for more patient-specific MIRD dose assessment. Excluding ACT, the results indicate that any of the acquisition techniques can provide a reasonable lung mass estimate. This work was supported in part by a residency grant from the AAPM.

