Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Comparative study of five growth models applied to weight data from congolese infants between birth and 13 months of
Kirsten B Simondon1, Francois Simondon1, Francis Delpeuch2
1Nutrition Department, ORSTOM (Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération), Dakar, BP 1386, Senegal, West Africa.
Insights
The four-parameter Reed model best fits infant weight data from birth to 13 months, outperforming other models. The Karlberg model is suitable for ages 2-12 months, while Count and Kouchi models showed poor fits.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Biostatistics
- Growth Modeling
Background:
- Accurate infant growth modeling is crucial for monitoring child development.
- Various mathematical models exist to describe infant weight changes.
- Evaluating model performance is essential for reliable data interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the goodness of fit and parameter estimation of five growth models.
- To identify the optimal model for describing weight data in Congolese infants.
- To assess model performance across different age ranges.
Main Methods:
- Weight data from 95 rural Congolese infants (birth to 13 months) were analyzed.
- Five growth models were tested: Karlberg (Infancy component), Count, Kouchi, and Reed (4- and 5-parameter versions).
- Model performance was evaluated using goodness of fit, parameter distribution, residuals, correlations, and skewness.
Main Results:
- Reed models provided the closest fits, followed by the Karlberg model.
- Count and Kouchi models demonstrated poor fits.
- The four-parameter Reed model was preferred over the five-parameter version.
- Three-parameter models showed systematic bias in neonatal weight estimation.
- Kouchi and Reed models exhibited high correlations; Kouchi and 5-parameter Reed showed parameter skewness.
Conclusions:
- The four-parameter linear Reed model is recommended for infant weight data (birth to 1 year) despite collinearity.
- The Infancy component of the Karlberg model is suitable for ages 2–12 months.
- Count and Kouchi models are not recommended for this dataset.
Abstract:
Five growth models are compared using weight data from 95 rural Congolese infants between birth and 13 months of age. The objective is to find the best model in terms of goodness of fit and distribution of parameter estimates. The Infancy component of the Karlberg model, the Count model, and the Kouchi model, which are all three-parameter models, are tested together with the four- and five-parameter versions of the Reed model. The closest fits are obtained using the Reed models, followed by the Karlberg model, while the Count and Kouchi models provide poor fits. The five-parameter Reed model is not superior to the four-parameter version. Examination of mean residuals by age shows a systematic bias in neonatal weight estimation with the three-parameter models. Mean within- and between-individual correlations are especially high for the Kouchi and Reed models. Extreme skewness is observed for some parameters of the Kouchi model and of the five-parameter Reed model. Despite its high degree of collinearity, the four-parameter linear Reed model should be preferred on weight data between birth and 1 year. The I-component of the Karlberg model could be used between ages 2 and 12 months. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Exponential Equations for Modeling Growth
Population Growth
Growth Models with Integration: Problem Solving
Modeling with Differential Equations
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns
Longitudinal Studies

