Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive
Jay Shavadia1, Robert Welsh1, Anthony Gershlick2
1Canadian VIGOUR Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Insights
Radial access (RA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) improves outcomes compared to femoral access (FA), regardless of whether patients receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy. This finding supports RA as a preferred approach for STEMI patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Radial access (RA) effectiveness in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is established for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).
- Limited data exists on RA versus femoral access (FA) in early postfibrinolytic STEMI patients.
- The STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) trial provides insights into arterial access site impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of RA versus FA in STEMI patients undergoing either a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy or pPCI.
- To evaluate the relationship between arterial access site and clinical outcomes in STEMI management.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1820 STEMI patients from the STREAM trial.
- Comparison of primary composite endpoint (death, shock, heart failure, reinfarction) and major bleeding between RA and FA groups.
- Multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline characteristics and treatment strategy (PI vs. pPCI).
Main Results:
- Radial access (RA) was associated with a significantly lower primary composite endpoint compared to femoral access (FA) (8.9% vs. 15.7%, P<0.001).
- This benefit of RA persisted on multivariable analysis in both pPCI (aOR 0.63) and PI (aOR 0.57) cohorts.
- No significant difference in non-intracranial major bleeding was observed between RA and FA groups (5.2% vs. 6.0%, P=0.489).
Conclusions:
- Radial access (RA) is associated with improved clinical outcomes in STEMI patients, irrespective of the reperfusion strategy (PI or pPCI).
- These findings reinforce existing evidence favoring RA for PCI in STEMI.
- RA demonstrates a favorable safety profile regarding major bleeding compared to FA.
Background:
The effectiveness of radial access (RA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been predominantly established in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with limited exploration of this issue in the early postfibrinolytic patient. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of RA versus femoral (FA) access in STEMI undergoing either a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy or pPCI.
Methods And Results:
Within STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM), we evaluated the relationship between arterial access site and primary outcome (30-day composite of death, shock, congestive heart failure, or reinfarction) and major bleeding according to the treatment strategy received. A total of 1820 STEMI patients were included: 895 PI (49.2%; rescue PCI [n=379; 42.3%], scheduled PCI [n=516; 57.7%]) and 925 pPCI (50.8%). Irrespective of treatment strategy, there was comparable utilization of either access site (FA: PI 53.4% and pPCI 57.6%). FA STEMI patients were younger, had lower presenting systolic blood pressure, lesser Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk, and more ∑ST-elevation at baseline. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 8.9% RA versus 15.7% FA patients (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, this benefit on the primary composite outcome favoring RA persisted (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.78; P<0.001) and was evident in both pPCI (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.92) and PI cohorts (adjusted OR, 0.57 95% CI, 0.37-0.86; P interaction=0.730). There was no difference in nonintracranial major bleeding with either access group (RA vs FA, 5.2% vs 6.0%; P=0.489).
Conclusions:
Regardless of the application of a PI or pPCI strategy, RA was associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting current STEMI evidence in favor of RA in PCI.
Clinical Trial Registration:
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00623623.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies


