Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods01:27

Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods

1.8K
Estimating microbial growth is essential for understanding population dynamics and environmental adaptations. Indirect methods provide valuable insights by measuring parameters such as turbidity, metabolic activity, and biomass, enabling efficient and reproducible assessments.During exponential growth, microbial cells scatter light proportionally to their biomass, a principle used in turbidity measurements. About one million cells per milliliter produce detectable scattering, which a...
1.8K
Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

916
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
916
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

55.1K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
55.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Benthic diatoms and phytoplankton diversity in urban streams and ponds: charting a course for conservation.

Biodiversity and conservation·2026
Same author

Improved predictive formulae for wave overtopping at sloped breakwaters using interpretable machine learning models.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Enhanced wave overtopping simulation at vertical breakwaters using machine learning algorithms.

PloS one·2023
Same author

New insights in the probability distributions of wave-by-wave overtopping volumes at vertical breakwaters.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Opportunities, approaches and challenges to the engagement of citizens in filling small water body data gaps.

Hydrobiologia·2022
Same author

Assessing the Utility of Electroencephalography for Staring Episodes in Children with Autism.

Irish medical journal·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

12.0K

Measurement differences between turbidity instruments, and their implications for suspended sediment concentration

A Rymszewicz1, J J O'Sullivan2, M Bruen2

  • 1School of Civil Engineering, UCD Dooge Centre for Water Resources Research, University College Dublin, Ireland.

Journal of Environmental Management
|May 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Different turbidity sensors show significant measurement inconsistencies, even when calibrated. This variability impacts water quality monitoring but may be less critical when turbidity is used as a surrogate for suspended sediment concentrations (SSC).

Keywords:
Instrument inter-comparisonLaboratory and field testingSediment loads and fluxSide-scatter and backscatterSuspended sediment concentrationsTurbidity sensors

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques
10:53

Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques

Published on: March 12, 2019

7.6K
A Flow-through Exposure System for Evaluating Suspended Sediments Effects on Aquatic Life
12:15

A Flow-through Exposure System for Evaluating Suspended Sediments Effects on Aquatic Life

Published on: January 9, 2017

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

12.0K
Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques
10:53

Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques

Published on: March 12, 2019

7.6K
A Flow-through Exposure System for Evaluating Suspended Sediments Effects on Aquatic Life
12:15

A Flow-through Exposure System for Evaluating Suspended Sediments Effects on Aquatic Life

Published on: January 9, 2017

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Water Quality Monitoring
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Turbidity is a key indicator for water quality and is used in regulations.
  • It often serves as a surrogate for suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) in monitoring programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the measurement consistency of various commercial turbidity sensors.
  • To benchmark sensor performance against known suspended sediment concentrations (SSC).

Main Methods:

  • Systematic, controlled experiments were conducted using 12 different turbidity sensors.
  • Sensors were tested with pre-prepared sediment suspensions of known SSC (20-1000 mg L⁻¹).
  • A field comparison of four sensors was performed during a rainfall event.

Main Results:

  • Significant variations (up to five-fold differences) in turbidity readings were observed among sensors for identical SSC.
  • Measurement inconsistencies were noted across different sensor designs (backscatter vs. side-scatter).
  • Despite absolute differences, field tests showed good correlation between turbidity and SSC (r² 0.92-0.98), leading to consistent sediment load estimates.

Conclusions:

  • Turbidity sensor inconsistency poses challenges for direct comparison of water quality data.
  • When used as a surrogate for SSC, consistent instrument use and monitoring for drift are crucial.
  • Awareness of potential measurement variability is essential for water resource managers.