Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

09:17
Using a Virtual Store As a Research Tool to Investigate Consumer In-store Behavior
Published on: July 24, 2017
12.0K
Shared decision making, a buzz-word in the Netherlands, the pace quickens towards nationwide implementation…
Trudy van der Weijden1, Heleen Post2, Paul L P Brand3
1Department of Family Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care CAPHRI Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL.
Summary
Shared decision making (SDM) is gaining traction, with patients largely supportive. However, challenges remain in fully meeting patient needs and integrating SDM effectively into clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare policy
- Clinical practice
- Patient engagement
Background:
- Shared decision making (SDM) is a growing focus for patient groups, policymakers, and professional organizations.
- The 2011 International Conference for Shared Decision Making (ISDM) spurred progress, yet Dutch clinicians face challenges with new responsibilities.
- While most patients favor SDM, current research indicates unmet needs regarding patient experiences and professional behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the current state and implementation challenges of shared decision making (SDM) in Dutch healthcare.
- To identify areas for improvement in daily practice and evaluate ongoing best practice initiatives.
- To examine the cultural shift towards SDM among patients and clinicians.
Main Methods:
- The study reviews current trends and challenges in SDM implementation.
- It analyzes patient and clinician perspectives on SDM adoption.
- It examines the impact of various best practices and system changes on SDM.
Main Results:
- Patient acceptance of SDM is high, but their needs are not fully met.
- Clinicians express hesitation due to new tasks and responsibilities.
- Numerous best practices are being developed and implemented to enhance SDM.
- Governmental and stakeholder support for SDM is strong in the Netherlands.
- The cultural shift towards SDM is ongoing but incomplete.
Conclusions:
- Significant progress has been made in promoting shared decision making (SDM), with strong support from various stakeholders.
- Despite patient enthusiasm, challenges persist in clinical practice regarding patient experiences and professional behavior.
- Continuous improvement, collaborative learning, and careful implementation are crucial to avoid overburdening patients with decisional stress.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Decision Making
1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method
7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Nursing Implementation
6.4K
Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
6.4K
Ethical Dilemmas II
2.6K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.6K
Standards of Care II
1.2K
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
1.2K

