Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Evaluation of Injury-induced Senescence and In Vivo Reprogramming in the Skeletal Muscle
Published on: October 26, 2017
Senescence-Inflammatory Regulation of Reparative Cellular Reprogramming in Aging and Cancer
Javier A Menendez1,2,3, Tomás Alarcón4,5,6,7
1Metabolism and Cancer Group, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance, Catalan Institute of OncologyGirona, Spain.
Abstract:
The inability of adult tissues to transitorily generate cells with functional stem cell-like properties is a major obstacle to tissue self-repair. Nuclear reprogramming-like phenomena that induce a transient acquisition of epigenetic plasticity and phenotype malleability may constitute a reparative route through which human tissues respond to injury, stress, and disease. However, tissue rejuvenation should involve not only the transient epigenetic reprogramming of differentiated cells, but also the committed re-acquisition of the original or alternative committed cell fate. Chronic or unrestrained epigenetic plasticity would drive aging phenotypes by impairing the repair or the replacement of damaged cells; such uncontrolled phenomena of in vivo reprogramming might also generate cancer-like cellular states. We herein propose that the ability of senescence-associated inflammatory signaling to regulate in vivo reprogramming cycles of tissue repair outlines a threshold model of aging and cancer. The degree of senescence/inflammation-associated deviation from the homeostatic state may delineate a type of thresholding algorithm distinguishing beneficial from deleterious effects of in vivo reprogramming. First, transient activation of NF-κB-related innate immunity and senescence-associated inflammatory components (e.g., IL-6) might facilitate reparative cellular reprogramming in response to acute inflammatory events. Second, para-inflammation switches might promote long-lasting but reversible refractoriness to reparative cellular reprogramming. Third, chronic senescence-associated inflammatory signaling might lock cells in highly plastic epigenetic states disabled for reparative differentiation. The consideration of a cellular reprogramming-centered view of epigenetic plasticity as a fundamental element of a tissue's capacity to undergo successful repair, aging degeneration or malignant transformation should provide challenging stochastic insights into the current deterministic genetic paradigm for most chronic diseases, thereby increasing the spectrum of therapeutic approaches for physiological aging and cancer.
Insights
Tissue repair relies on controlled cellular reprogramming. Senescence and inflammation create a threshold model, where transient signals aid repair, but chronic inflammation drives aging and cancer by hindering cell fate.
Area of Science:
- Cellular biology
- Epigenetics
- Tissue regeneration
Background:
- Adult tissues struggle with self-repair due to limited stem cell-like properties.
- Nuclear reprogramming offers a potential route for tissue repair by inducing transient epigenetic plasticity.
- Uncontrolled plasticity can lead to aging phenotypes and cancer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a threshold model of aging and cancer based on senescence-associated inflammatory signaling regulating in vivo reprogramming.
- To elucidate the role of inflammation in controlling cellular reprogramming for tissue repair.
Main Methods:
- The study proposes a theoretical framework, integrating existing knowledge on cellular reprogramming, senescence, and inflammation.
- Analysis of how senescence-associated inflammatory signaling (e.g., NF-κB, IL-6) influences in vivo reprogramming cycles.
- Examination of the threshold dynamics distinguishing beneficial from detrimental reprogramming outcomes.
Main Results:
- Transient NF-κB activation and inflammatory signals can facilitate reparative cellular reprogramming after acute injury.
- Para-inflammation can induce reversible refractoriness to reprogramming.
- Chronic senescence-associated inflammation may lock cells in plastic states, impairing differentiation and repair, potentially leading to aging or cancer.
Conclusions:
- Cellular reprogramming is central to tissue repair, aging, and cancer.
- Senescence-associated inflammation acts as a threshold regulator of in vivo reprogramming, determining repair, aging, or malignant transformation.
- This reprogramming-centered view offers new therapeutic targets for aging and cancer, challenging deterministic genetic paradigms.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Replicative Cell Senescence
Inflammatory Response
Inflammation can be triggered by various stimuli, such as impact, abrasion, chemical irritation, infections, and extreme hot or cold temperatures. These can damage cells and connective tissue fibers,...
Renewal of Skin Epidermal Stem Cells
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming
Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Role Of Notch Signalling In Intestinal Stem Cell Renewal
Direct cell-to-cell contact is needed for the activation of Notch signaling. The signal is initiated when a notch ligand binds to a receptor on an adjacent cell, also...

