Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Technical Skills Development for Medical Students in an Otolaryngology Mentorship Program.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Optimising the caffeine nap for counteracting driver sleepiness in CPAP treated obstructive sleep apnoea patients.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Adventitious Error and Its Implications for Testing Relations Between Variables and for Composite Measurement Outcomes.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Developing and evaluating the feasibility and usability of desktop simulator-based driver training for international college students seeking a US driver's license: a pilot study.

Traffic injury prevention·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence automated solution for hazard annotation and eye tracking in a simulated environment.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2025
Same author

Assessment of visual function under various lighting conditions in a cohort of active older drivers: dimensionality and principal metrics.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

902

Multi-Institutional Development of a Mastoidectomy Performance Evaluation Instrument.

Thomas Kerwin1, Brad Hittle1, Don Stredney1

  • 1Interface Lab, Ohio Supercomputer Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Journal of Surgical Education
|May 24, 2017
PubMed
Summary

A multi-institutional expert group developed a surgical performance rating tool for mastoidectomy. Further validation is needed for universal acceptance of this critical surgical skill assessment.

Keywords:
Medical KnowledgePractice-Based Learning and Improvementassessmentmastoidectomymulti-institutionotology

More Related Videos

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
07:06

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique

Published on: May 23, 2021

4.5K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

902
Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
07:06

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique

Published on: May 23, 2021

4.5K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Surgical Education
  • Medical Simulation

Background:

  • A universal method for rating mastoidectomy surgical performance across teaching institutions is lacking.
  • This study addresses the need for a standardized assessment tool in otolaryngology training.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and refine a rating instrument for evaluating mastoidectomy surgical performance.
  • To create a consensus-based checklist applicable in multi-institutional settings.

Main Methods:

  • A modified Delphi approach and participatory design were used by expert otologists.
  • A 15-element checklist was developed, refined to 14 elements focusing on safety, and tested on a diverse performance population.
  • The study involved 14 surgeons from 12 US otolaryngological training programs.

Main Results:

  • An initial rating scale for mastoidectomy performance was created using expert consensus and literature review.
  • Early use indicated moderate rater agreement, leading to revised definitions emphasizing safety.
  • A second, refined rating instrument was developed based on initial feedback and performance data.

Conclusions:

  • Consensus-building among experts is effective for creating surgical rating instruments.
  • Expert opinion and Delphi methods provide initial validity but require further testing for universal acceptance.
  • Continued development and large-scale validation are essential to establish reliability and widespread use of the mastoidectomy rating tool.