Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

09:40
Generation of Genomic Deletions in Mammalian Cell Lines via CRISPR/Cas9
Published on: January 3, 2015
96.7K
Complementary information derived from CRISPR Cas9 mediated gene deletion and suppression.
Joseph Rosenbluh1,2, Han Xu1, William Harrington1
1Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 415 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Nature Communications
|May 24, 2017
Summary
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing and CRISPRi gene suppression were compared for identifying essential genes. Both methods are effective, but CRISPRi avoids biases seen with CRISPR-Cas9, though it can produce false positives.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genomics
- Genetic Engineering
Background:
- CRISPR-Cas9 enables genome editing and loss-of-function screens.
- Cas9 endonuclease expression can cause gene-independent responses, limiting its use in screens.
- Catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) fused with KRAB offers an alternative for gene suppression via transcriptional interference.
Purpose of the Study:
- Directly compare CRISPR-Cas9 (CRISPRc) and KRAB-dCas9 (CRISPRi) for identifying cell essential genes in loss-of-function screens.
- Evaluate the efficiency and potential biases of each CRISPR-based screening approach.
- Determine if combining CRISPRc and CRISPRi offers complementary insights into genetic screens.
Main Methods:
- Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 (CRISPRc) was performed.
- Gene suppression using KRAB-fused catalytically inactive Cas9 (CRISPRi) was implemented.
- Library construction for CRISPRi was optimized by analyzing transcriptional start sites (TSS).
Main Results:
- CRISPRc identified 98% of previously defined cell essential genes.
- CRISPRi, after optimization, identified 92% of core cell essential genes.
- CRISPRi showed no bias towards copy number alteration regions, unlike CRISPRc, but produced false positives with bidirectional promoters.
Conclusions:
- CRISPRc and CRISPRi exhibit distinct off-target effects.
- Combining CRISPRc and CRISPRi approaches provides complementary data for loss-of-function genetic screens.
- Both CRISPR-based methods are valuable tools for essential gene identification, with different strengths and weaknesses.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
CRISPR
58.3K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
58.3K
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
2.2K
The CRISPR-Cas system serves as a bacterial defense mechanism against invading genetic elements such as viruses and plasmids, forming the foundation for its adaptation as a powerful genome-editing tool. Originally discovered in prokaryotes, this system has been repurposed to revolutionize genetic engineering across a wide range of organisms, including plants, animals, and humans. The core component, Cas9, is an endonuclease derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, capable of introducing...
2.2K
Homologous Recombination
64.4K
The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...
64.4K

