Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.0K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.0K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.8K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.8K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

112.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
112.1K
Significant Figures in Calculations00:58

Significant Figures in Calculations

20.4K
Uncertainty in measurements can be avoided by reporting the results of a calculation with the correct number of significant figures. This can be determined by the following rules for rounding numbers:
20.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors influencing multidisciplinary clinical decision-making in the critical care unit: a systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.

BJA open·2025
Same author

Understanding UK policymakers' evidence needs through policy questions.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Uncertainty and decision-making in critical care: lessons from managing COVID-19 ARDS in preparation for the next pandemic.

BMJ open respiratory research·2025
Same author

Perceived risk of type 2 diabetes: Using linked genomic, clinical and questionnaire data to understand the potential use of genetic risk tools in British South Asians.

PLOS global public health·2025
Same author

An integrative framework for mapping the psychological landscape of risk perception.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Supporting effective shared decision-making in surgical context: Why framing of choices matters for high-risk patients and clinicians.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.5K

The problems of increasing transparency on uncertainty.

Magda Osman1, Amanda J Heath2, Ragnar Löfstedt3

  • 1Queen Mary University of London, UK.

Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)
|May 25, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Regulators demand scientific uncertainty transparency for public benefit. However, this approach may harm public understanding and scientists

Keywords:
public knowledgeregulatorsscientific practicestransparencyuncertainty

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.5K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Policy
  • Scientific Communication
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Regulatory bodies like the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) increasingly require scientists to disclose evidence uncertainties.
  • The stated aim is to empower the public and ensure accountability in science-informed policy.
  • Current transparency guidelines raise questions about defining and communicating uncertainty effectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the impact of mandated transparency of scientific uncertainty on public understanding.
  • To explore the potential negative consequences of current uncertainty disclosure practices.
  • To propose improvements for making uncertainty communication beneficial for both the public and scientists.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current regulatory guidelines for scientific uncertainty disclosure.
  • Discussion of practical implications and challenges in implementing transparency.
  • Conceptual exploration of alternative approaches to uncertainty communication.

Main Results:

  • The drive for transparency in scientific uncertainty may inadvertently mislead or confuse the public.
  • Current methods of disclosing uncertainty might not serve the intended beneficiaries effectively.
  • Significant challenges exist in defining and consistently communicating what constitutes scientific uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Mandatory transparency of scientific uncertainty, as currently practiced, may be counterproductive.
  • Rethinking communication strategies is crucial to ensure that uncertainty disclosure benefits, rather than harms, public understanding and trust.
  • Further research and dialogue are needed to develop effective methods for worthwhile uncertainty communication.