Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026
08:01
A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
Published on: August 12, 2016
9.5K
Relation between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and micronutrient intake in a prospective study
P Mullie1,2,3, E Mertens1,4, R Charlier4
1International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon, France.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
|May 25, 2017
Summary
Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption was linked to lower intake of key minerals like calcium, iron, and magnesium. However, the study found minimal evidence of a significant dilutional effect on overall micronutrient consumption.
Area of Science:
- Nutrition Science
- Dietary Patterns
- Public Health
Background:
- Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are linked to nutrient displacement.
- Understanding the impact of SSBs on micronutrient intake is crucial for dietary guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prospective relationship between SSB consumption and micronutrient intake in adults.
- To assess the potential micronutrient dilution effect of SSBs over a 10-year period.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study with 562 adults assessed in 2002 and 2012.
- Data collection included anthropometric, lifestyle, and nutritional intake parameters.
- Statistical analysis examined associations between SSB intake and specific micronutrients.
Main Results:
- Increased SSB consumption correlated with decreased intake of calcium, iron, and magnesium.
- A 100 ml increase in SSB intake was associated with lower calcium, iron, and magnesium levels.
- No significant association was found between SSB consumption and vitamin intake.
Conclusions:
- The study suggests a limited dilutional effect of SSBs on dietary micronutrient consumption.
- Findings indicate a potential negative impact on mineral intake with higher SSB consumption.
- Participant attrition (36% follow-up rate) is a notable limitation.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
193
Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
193
01:27Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
467
Bioavailability is a crucial pharmacokinetic parameter that quantifies the proportion of an administered drug that reaches the systemic circulation and is available for therapeutic action. Regulatory agencies mandate the assessment of bioavailability, typically measured as the area under the drug plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), to ensure the efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical products. These evaluations are categorized as absolute and relative bioavailability studies.Absolute...
467
00:55Convenience Sampling Method
11.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
11.9K
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
1.3K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.3K