Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Nasolacrimal Lavage as a Treatment for Ocular Surface Toxic Soup Syndrome
Published on: April 25, 2025
Pediatric nasolacrimal duct obstruction-benefit of a combined therapeutic approach
Miloš Fischer1,2, Iris-Susanne Horn3, Mathias Otto4
1Clinic of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Head Medicine and Oral Health, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. milos.fischer@sbk-vs.de.
Insights
Pediatric nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PNDO) treatment outcomes improved with an endonasal endoscopic approach compared to conventional probing. This technique offers better stenosis identification and surgical intervention for improved clinical results in children.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Surgery
- Otorhinolaryngology
Background:
- Pediatric nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PNDO) often necessitates intervention when conservative methods fail.
- A lack of standardized treatment guidelines for PNDO highlights the need for comparative studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two distinct intervention techniques for pediatric nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
- To determine the advantages of conventional probing versus an endonasal endoscopic approach in pediatric PNDO management.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 233 children (aged 0-208 months) with PNDO were treated between January 2006 and June 2014.
- Group I underwent conventional probing by ophthalmologists; Group II received an endonasal endoscopic interdisciplinary approach.
- Clinical outcomes were analyzed to assess treatment efficacy.
Main Results:
- The endonasal endoscopic approach (Group II) demonstrated a higher overall success rate (98.4%) compared to conventional probing (Group I, 93.4%).
- Approximately 50% of Group II interventions required additional surgical procedures, particularly in younger (<6 months) and older (>24 months) children.
Conclusions:
- Endoscopic control facilitates precise identification of nasolacrimal duct stenosis, enabling targeted surgical intervention and improved clinical outcomes.
- Endonasal endoscopic surgical techniques are recommended as the standard of care for treating pediatric nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Background:
Pediatric nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PNDO) requires therapeutic intervention after conservative procedures failed. As resilient treatment guidelines for the treatment are missing, the aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages of two different intervention techniques in children with PNDO.
Methods:
Between January, 2006 and June, 2014, 233 children (0-208 months) were treated either with conventional probing by ophthalmologists only (Group I) or with endonasal endoscopic interdisciplinary approach (Group II). The clinical outcome was analyzed.
Results:
The overall success rate of Group I was 93.4% compared to 98.4% of Group II (P<0.05). 50% of all interventions (n=62) of Group II required further surgical procedures in addition to probing/irrigation, particularly with regard to children <6 and >24 months.
Conclusions:
Endoscopic control in treatment of PNDO allows exact identification of the stenosis and appropriate surgical intervention with an improved clinical outcome. Endonasal endoscopic surgical techniques should be the standard PNDO treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Systems

