Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissociable sensitivity of auditory evoked fields and 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses to spatial novelty.

Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Brivaracetam-associated manic episode in a patient with bipolar disorder: A case report.

PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026
Same author

Temporal Dynamics of Auditory Evoked Neural Oscillations Under a Paired-Pulse Suppression Paradigm.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Subjective well-being among clinically stable psychiatric outpatients: differences between mood disorders, subthreshold conditions, and community controls.

BMC psychiatry·2026
Same author

Accelerometer-based characteristics of evoked mechanomyograms in the orbicularis oculi muscle.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Lurasidone continuation in real-world clinical cases in Japan: retrospective study of factors associated with six-month persistence.

Annals of general psychiatry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K

New paradigm for auditory paired pulse suppression.

Nobuyuki Takeuchi1, Shunsuke Sugiyama2, Koji Inui3,4

  • 1Neuropsychiatric Department, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.

Plos One
|May 26, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that a 600 ms interval between identical auditory stimuli effectively suppresses cortical responses, indicating long-latency inhibition. This non-invasive method requires a strong prepulse, offering a new way to assess sensory gating.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K
Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • Sensory gating prevents information overload, with prepulse inhibition (PPI) and P50 suppression as key measures.
  • These measures are clinically relevant for conditions like schizophrenia.
  • Long-latency paired-pulse suppression of change-related cortical responses remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate long-latency paired-pulse suppression of auditory change-related cortical responses.
  • To determine the optimal conditioning-test interval (CTI) for this suppression.
  • To explore the influence of prepulse intensity on suppression magnitude.

Main Methods:

  • Used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to record cortical responses to auditory stimuli.
  • Employed a change-related response evoked by an abrupt sound pressure increase.
  • Varied conditioning-test intervals (CTI) and prepulse sound pressure levels.

Main Results:

  • Clear suppression of the test response observed, peaking at a CTI of 600 ms with ~30% inhibition.
  • Significant suppression (>25%) required prepulses at least 12 dB louder than the background (77 dB).
  • Similar suppression levels confirmed using electroencephalography (EEG).

Conclusions:

  • Two identical auditory change stimuli separated by 600 ms are effective for observing long-latency inhibition.
  • Long-latency suppression necessitates a relatively strong prepulse, unlike short-latency suppression.
  • This non-invasive method offers a brief and efficient approach to studying sensory gating.