Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Evaluation of the systemic micro- and macrovasculature in stable angina: A case-control study
Ulf Neisius1,2, Erin Olson1, Sabrina H Rossi1
1BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Insights
Non-invasive tests of microvascular function and carotid plaque burden can help differentiate between coronary artery disease and normal coronary arteries. These systemic vascular measures improve diagnostic accuracy for stable angina.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Vascular Biology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Stable angina diagnosis relies on clinical probability, age, gender, and risk factors.
- The link between cardiac and systemic vasculature suggests potential for non-invasive assessment.
- Systemic vascular measures may offer new diagnostic avenues for coronary artery disease (CAD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if non-invasive measures of systemic micro- and macrovascular structure and function differentiate between patients with flow-limiting CAD and those with normal coronary arteries (NCA).
Main Methods:
- Recruited 84 patients undergoing coronary angiography for stable angina symptoms.
- Assessed microvascular endothelial function using Endo-PAT2000 (reactive hyperemia index).
- Evaluated macrovascular parameters: carotid plaque score, pulse wave velocity, intima-media thickness, and distensibility.
Main Results:
- Microvascular endothelial function (reactive hyperemia index) and carotid plaque score were significantly different between CAD and NCA groups.
- No significant differences were found in pulse wave velocity, carotid intima-media thickness, or carotid distensibility.
- Adding microvascular function and carotid plaque score to traditional risk factors improved the diagnostic accuracy (c-statistic) for CAD.
Conclusions:
- Distinct differences exist in systemic vasculature between patients with CAD and NCA.
- Carotid artery plaque burden and microvascular function show promise for guiding diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.
- These non-invasive markers enhance the diagnostic capability beyond traditional risk factors.
Aims:
The diagnosis of stable angina involves the use of probability estimates based on clinical presentation, age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors. In view of the link between the cardiac and systemic vasculature we tested whether non-invasive measures of systemic micro- and macrovascular structure and function differentiate between individuals with flow-limiting coronary artery disease (CAD) and those with normal coronary arteries (NCA).
Methods And Results:
We recruited 84 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography for investigation of symptoms of stable angina. Patients were selected for either having significant CAD or NCA (n = 43/41; age, 56±7 vs 57±7 years, P = 0.309). Only microvascular endothelial function, measured using the Endo-PAT2000 device to determine reactive hyperaemia index (CAD vs. NCA; 1.9 [1.5; 2.3] vs. 2.1 [1.8; 2.4], P = 0.03) and sonographic carotid plaque score (CAD vs. NCA; 3.0 [1.5; 4.5] vs. 1.2 [0; 2.55], P<0.001) were significantly different between patients with CAD and NCA. No significant differences were detected in reflection magnitude (CAD vs. NCA; 1.7 [1.5; 1.8] % vs 1.7 [1.5; 1.9] %, P = 0.342), pulse wave velocity (CAD vs. NCA; 7.8±1.4 m/sec vs. 8.3±1.5 m/sec, P = 0.186), carotid intima-media thickness (CAD vs. NCA; 0.73±0.10 mm vs. 0.75±0.10 mm, P = 0.518) or carotid distensibility (CAD vs. NCA; 3.8±1.2 10-3/kPa vs. 3.4±0.9 10-3/kPa, P = 0.092). Also, the c-statistic of the pre-test probability based on history and traditional risk factors (c = 0.665; 95% CI, 0.540-0.789) was improved by the addition of the inverse RHI (c = 0.720; 95% CI, 0.605-0.836), carotid plaque score (c = 0.770, 95% CI, 0.659-0.881), and of both markers in combination (c = 0.801; 95% CI, 0.701-0.900).
Conclusion:
There are distinct differences in the systemic vasculature between patients with CAD and NCA that may have the potential to guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Carotid artery plaque burden and microvascular function appear to be most promising in this context.
More Related Videos
08:42Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
10:28Evaluation of Vascular Control Mechanisms Utilizing Video Microscopy of Isolated Resistance Arteries of Rats
Published on: December 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina I: Introduction