Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

674
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
674
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

22.9K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
22.9K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associations of distinct sedentary behaviors with cortical, subcortical, and white matter hyperintensity volumes: Evidence from the ARIC study.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

From significant to meaningful: ATOMizing the study of sex differences and similarities.

Frontiers in neuroendocrinology·2026
Same author

Influence of Body Configuration on Kinetics and Multijoint Control Strategies Sprinters Use During the First Step Out of Blocks.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same author

Associations of sleep behaviors with white matter hyperintensity volume in middle-aged to older adults.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Assessing metadata privacy in neuroimaging.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Public Health.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging
07:12

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging

Published on: January 24, 2025

1.5K

Beyond differences in means: robust graphical methods to compare two groups in neuroscience.

Guillaume A Rousselet1, Cyril R Pernet2, Rand R Wilcox3

  • 1Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, G12 8QB, Glasgow, UK.

The European Journal of Neuroscience
|May 26, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Improving neuroscience research quality can be achieved by adopting detailed graphical methods and robust inferential statistics. These advanced techniques offer deeper insights into group differences compared to traditional bar graphs and t-tests.

Keywords:
data visualisationdifference asymmetry functionquantile estimationrobust statisticsshift function

More Related Videos

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.4K
A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging
07:12

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging

Published on: January 24, 2025

1.5K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.4K
A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Data Visualization
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Current neuroscience research quality can be improved with simpler steps.
  • Traditional methods like bar graphs and t-tests may limit understanding of group differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for detailed graphical methods and robust inferential statistics in neuroscience.
  • To introduce novel tools for analyzing group differences in observational data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing detailed graphical methods for data visualization.
  • Applying robust inferential statistics, including shift functions and difference asymmetry functions.
  • Implementing tools in R and MATLAB for reproducibility.

Main Results:

  • Detailed graphical methods provide a more nuanced understanding of group differences than conventional approaches.
  • Shift functions and difference asymmetry functions offer complementary perspectives on data.

Conclusions:

  • Adopting advanced graphical and statistical methods can significantly enhance the quality and depth of neuroscience research.
  • The presented tools (shift function, difference asymmetry function) are valuable additions to the neuroscientist's analytical toolkit.