Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Evaluating the accuracy and economic value of a new test in the absence of a perfect reference test
Xuanqian Xie1,2, Alison Sinclair1, Nandini Dendukuri1,3
1Technology Assessment Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Background:
Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) pneumonia is often treated empirically as diagnosis is challenging because of the lack of a perfect test. Using BinaxNOW-SP, a urinary antigen test, as an add-on to standard cultures may not only increase diagnostic yield but also increase costs.
Objective:
To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of BinaxNOW-SP and subsequently estimate the cost-effectiveness of adding BinaxNOW-SP to the diagnostic work-up.
Design:
We fit a Bayesian latent-class meta-analysis model to obtain estimates of BinaxNOW-SP accuracy that adjust for the imperfect accuracy of culture. Meta-analysis results were combined with information on prevalence of SP pneumonia to estimate the number of patients who are correctly classified under competing diagnostic strategies. Taking into consideration the cost of antibiotics, we determined the incremental cost of adding BinaxNOW-SP to the work-up per case correctly diagnosed.
Results:
The BinaxNOW-SP test had a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.67-0.83) and a pooled specificity of 0.96 (95% CrI, 0.92-0.99). An overall increase in diagnostic accuracy of 6.2% due to the addition of BinaxNOW-SP corresponded to an incremental cost per case correctly classified of $582 Canadian dollars.
Conclusions:
The methods we have described allow us to evaluate the accuracy and economic value of a new test in the absence of a perfect reference test using an evidence-based approach.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Reliability and Validity

