Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Competition02:34

Competition

25.2K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
25.2K
Threats to Biodiversity01:50

Threats to Biodiversity

27.5K
There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
27.5K
Ecological Succession02:17

Ecological Succession

21.8K
Ecological succession is influenced by the processes of facilitation, inhibition, and toleration. Facilitation occurs when early successional species create more favorable ecological conditions for subsequent species, such as enhanced nutrient, water, or light availability. In contrast, inhibition happens when early successional species create unfavorable ecological conditions for potential successive species, such as limiting resource availability. In some cases, later successional species...
21.8K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

28.9K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
28.9K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

13.0K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
13.0K
Softwoods and Hardwoods01:28

Softwoods and Hardwoods

633
Softwoods and hardwoods, derived from different types of trees, are distinguished by their leaf structures and cellular compositions, each serving unique purposes in construction and manufacturing. Softwoods come from cone-bearing trees with needle-like leaves and are predominantly composed of longitudinal cells called tracheids and a smaller proportion of radial cells known as rays. Due to their cellular structure, softwoods are commonly used in construction for structural frames, sheathing,...
633

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fine-root trait variation in temperate trees follows arc-shape pattern along deep soil profiles.

The New phytologist·2026
Same author

De-Coupled Water and Nitrogen Translocation From Subsoil to Canopy of Temperate Forest Trees.

Plant, cell & environment·2025
Same author

Douglas-fir raises xylem safety in response to a drier climate but also increases supported leaf area.

Tree physiology·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "A warmer climate impairs the growth performance of Central Europe's major timber species in lowland regions" [Sci. Total. Environ. Volume 941 (2024) Article Number 173665].

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Douglas fir - A victim of its high productivity in a warming climate? Predominantly negative growth trends in the North German Lowlands.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Water consumption of beech, spruce and Douglas fir in pure and mixed stands in a wet and a dry year - Testing predictions of the iso/anisohydry concept.

The Science of the total environment·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Technique to Screen American Beech for Resistance to the Beech Scale Insect Cryptococcus fagisuga Lind.
12:47

A Technique to Screen American Beech for Resistance to the Beech Scale Insect Cryptococcus fagisuga Lind.

Published on: May 27, 2014

10.1K

Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis.

Christoph Leuschner1, Dietrich Hertel1, Heinz Coners1

  • 1Plant Ecology, FB 19, University of Kassel, 34109, Kassel, Germany.

Oecologia
|May 27, 2017
PubMed
Summary

European beech (Fagus sylvatica) exhibits stronger below-ground competition than sessile oak (Quercus petraea) in mixed forests. Beech fine roots outcompete oak roots, especially in nitrogen-rich topsoil, indicating asymmetric competition.

Keywords:
Below-ground competitionCompetition experimentFine rootsHorizontal root distributionMixed forest

More Related Videos

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods
08:20

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

6.3K
Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps
05:28

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Published on: January 19, 2020

5.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Technique to Screen American Beech for Resistance to the Beech Scale Insect Cryptococcus fagisuga Lind.
12:47

A Technique to Screen American Beech for Resistance to the Beech Scale Insect Cryptococcus fagisuga Lind.

Published on: May 27, 2014

10.1K
A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods
08:20

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

6.3K
Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps
05:28

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Published on: January 19, 2020

5.9K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Forest Science
  • Plant Biology

Background:

  • Below-ground competition dynamics between tree species in mixed forests remain poorly understood.
  • Understanding root interactions is crucial for predicting forest ecosystem functioning and resilience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate asymmetric competition between fine roots (<2 mm) of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and sessile oak (Quercus petraea) in a mixed temperate forest.
  • To quantify root biomass, density, and spatial distribution patterns of beech and oak in both mixed and monospecific stands.

Main Methods:

  • Field experiments utilizing the root chamber technique to observe fine-root growth under controlled conditions.
  • Comparative analysis of fine-root biomass in two-species (beech-oak) versus monospecific plots.
  • Assessment of root system density and overlap within shared soil volumes.

Main Results:

  • Beech fine roots demonstrated more rapid growth than oak roots when co-occurring.
  • In mixed stands, beech showed significantly higher fine-root biomass, root tip, and ectomycorrhiza numbers compared to oak.
  • Beech exhibited a greater root:shoot ratio (RAI:LAI = 3.9) than oak (RAI:LAI = 1.7), with oak's low biomass attributed to competitive exclusion by beech.
  • Oak dominated the coarse root fraction, while beech dominated fine roots in the organic topsoil, with complete overlap in distribution.

Conclusions:

  • Asymmetric interspecific root competition favors European beech over sessile oak in this mixed temperate forest stand.
  • Beech fine roots are more successful in colonizing nitrogen-rich patches within the organic topsoil.
  • These findings highlight the importance of root competition in structuring mixed forest communities.