Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

1.0K
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
1.0K
Elaborative Rehearsals01:07

Elaborative Rehearsals

428
Elaborative rehearsal is a crucial cognitive strategy that strengthens information encoding in long-term memory by making meaningful connections between new data and pre-existing knowledge. This approach contrasts with maintenance rehearsal, which involves simple repetition without delving into the significance of the information. While maintenance rehearsal might temporarily keep information active in short-term memory, it is less effective for long-term retention.
The effectiveness of...
428
Retrieval01:12

Retrieval

486
Retrieval is the process of getting information out of memory storage and back into conscious awareness. This ability is essential for daily tasks like brushing hair and teeth, driving to work, and performing job duties. Retrieval occurs in three ways: recall, recognition, and relearning.
Recall involves accessing information without cues, such as during an essay test, where individuals must retrieve facts and concepts from memory unaided. Another example is remembering the name of a colleague...
486

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shades of smiles: creating variants of smiles from neutral images of real individuals - method and validation.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

From Sensory Details to Verbal Codes: Visual Memory Reinstatement of Location and Color Features.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Expressing experiences: Sensorimotor activations and interoceptive sensibility influence which words we choose when speaking.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Evolving object concepts in the adult brain: An electrophysiological investigation.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2025
Same author

Neural dynamics of mental state attribution to social robot faces.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2025
Same author

People with aphasia show stable Cumulative Semantic Interference (CSI) when tested repeatedly in a web-based paradigm: A perspective for longitudinal assessment.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.9K

Having a task partner affects lexical retrieval: Spoken word production in shared task settings.

Anna K Kuhlen1, Rasha Abdel Rahman1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18, 12489 Berlin, Germany.

Cognition
|May 30, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Speaking with a partner significantly impacts language production. Studies show that collaborative picture naming by partners leads to greater semantic interference, affecting individual lexical retrieval.

Keywords:
Joint actionLanguage productionLexical retrievalSemantic interference

More Related Videos

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.8K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.9K
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.8K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Language Production

Background:

  • Acting jointly with others differs from acting alone.
  • Language production research explores collaborative processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate differences in language production when speaking with a partner versus alone.
  • Examine cumulative semantic interference during partnered picture naming.

Main Methods:

  • Participants named sequences of semantically related pictures, either alone or taking turns with a partner.
  • Measured naming latencies to assess semantic interference.
  • Controlled for auditory cues by using remote partners and visual-only presentation in different experiments.

Main Results:

  • Cumulative semantic interference was confirmed, with naming latencies increasing with category members.
  • Sharper increases in naming latencies occurred when partners named within-category pictures.
  • This effect persisted even when participants believed their partner was naming or could not hear them.

Conclusions:

  • Partner presence profoundly affects the language production system.
  • Lexical processes are triggered by a partner's actions, leading to interference.
  • Collaboration influences individual language processing beyond simple auditory input.