Growth of a national sample of Israeli children: Are local standards needed?

H Palti1, B Adler1, J Bendel2

  • 1Hadassah Medical Organization and the Hebrew University, Hadassah Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Israel.

Insights

Israeli Jewish children

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Growth and Development
  • Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Anthropometry and Biostatistics

Background:

  • Assessing child growth is crucial for public health.
  • Established reference data, like the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) medians, are vital for growth monitoring.
  • Understanding growth patterns in diverse populations is essential for accurate health assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the growth patterns of Israeli Jewish children aged 9-15 months and 7-10 years.
  • To compare their anthropometric data (stature, weight, birth weight) against NCHS reference data.
  • To investigate ethnic variations in growth within the Israeli Jewish population.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized personal records from two large national samples of Israeli Jewish children (n=7,532 and 4,638).
  • Compared measured statures and weights against NCHS median reference data.
  • Analyzed growth differences among ethnic subgroups (Asian, African, European, American origins) after adjusting for covariates.

Main Results:

  • Median birth weights were similar to NCHS reference data.
  • Both male and female children were slightly, though statistically significantly, lighter and shorter than NCHS references.
  • Ethnic variations were observed, with children of Asian and African origin showing lower weights and statures compared to those of European or American origin.

Conclusions:

  • Israeli Jewish children's growth is largely unconstrained, supporting the use of NCHS data as a reference standard.
  • Despite statistically significant differences, observed variations in stature and weight lack biological significance.
  • The heterogeneous and evolving ethnic composition of Israel, coupled with global migration trends, makes local growth standard development impractical.

Related Concept Videos

Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.7K
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence01:23

Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

Alfred Binet, along with his student Théophile Simon, was tasked by the French Ministry of Education in 1904 to create a method for identifying students who struggled to learn through conventional classroom instruction. This initiative aimed to address overcrowding by placing such students in specialized schools. Binet and Simon developed an intelligence test comprising 30 tasks, ranging from simple commands, like touching one's nose or ear, to more complex tasks, such as drawing...
1.8K
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
302
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.9K
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation02:32

Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation

In the field of psychology, there are several ways to organize measurements of a trait, feature, or characteristic (i.e., variables). Qualitative data, such as ethnicity, can be tabulated into a frequency count to provide information about the proportion, as well as the variety of groups in a sample or population. On the other hand, researchers can perform a wider set of calculations on quantitative data. The mean, mode, and median, for instance, are central tendency measures to identify a...
29.7K
Central Limit Theorem01:14

Central Limit Theorem

The central limit theorem, abbreviated as clt, is one of the most powerful and useful ideas in all of statistics. The central limit theorem for sample means says that if you repeatedly draw samples of a given size and calculate their means, and create a histogram of those means, then the resulting histogram will tend to have an approximate normal bell shape. In other words, as sample sizes increase, the distribution of means follows the normal distribution more closely.
The sample size, n, that...
20.7K