Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients
Published on: June 17, 2019
EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search
Anne-Marie Brouwer1, Maarten A Hogervorst1, Bob Oudejans1
1Perceptual and Cognitive Systems, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO)Soesterberg, Netherlands.
Eye tracking and electroencephalography (EEG) measures reveal differences between correctly identified targets and missed targets during visual search. Pupil size and fixation duration better distinguish hits from misses, while saccade-related potentials (SRPs) better identify targets versus non-targets.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Human Factors
- Psychology
Background:
- Visual search involves target detection and memory encoding.
- Eye-tracking and electroencephalography (EEG) measures, including fixation duration, pupil size, and saccade-related potentials (SRPs), can reflect cognitive processes during visual search.
- Previous research indicates these variables differentiate between fixating on targets versus non-targets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether eye-tracking and EEG variables differentiate between correctly identified targets (hits) and missed targets (misses).
- To explore the complementary roles of eye-tracking and EEG in understanding visual search and memory encoding failures.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a visual search task with varying numbers of targets per trial.
- A concurrent auditory math task (high load) was used to induce memory encoding failures, compared to a low load condition.
- Eye-tracking (fixation duration, pupil size) and EEG (SRPs) data were recorded.
Main Results:
- More targets were missed under high cognitive load compared to low load.
- Eye-tracking features (larger pupil size, shorter fixation duration for missed targets) better distinguished hits from misses than targets from non-targets.
- SRP features (larger P300 waveforms for targets) better distinguished targets from non-targets than hits from misses.
Conclusions:
- Eye-tracking and EEG measures provide complementary information about visual search processes.
- Eye-tracking variables may indicate encoding failures, while SRPs may reflect target relevance.
- These findings suggest potential applications for monitoring observer attention and memory in search tasks.
More Related Videos
10:41Using Electroencephalography Measurements and High-quality Video Recording for Analyzing Visual Perception of Media Content
Published on: May 26, 2018
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018