Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Method to Test the Effect of Environmental Cues on Mating Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
Published on: July 17, 2017
MATING PREFERENCE AND ITS RELEVANCE TO ADAPTATION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: INVERSION POLYMORPHISM AND DDT
Phillip T Barnes1, David J Merrell1
1Zoology Program, Department of Ecology and Behavioral Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455.
Abstract:
The importance of adult mating success as a component of fitness influencing inversion polymorphism in two DDT-resistant populations of Drosophila melanogaster was investigated. The polymorphism involved In(3R)P and the Standard (St) gene arrangement. In population 731R the St/St females showed greater mating propensity than In/In females, while in population J2 the In/In females showed a significant positive association between mating propensity and the percentage of St/St males present. Mating preference data showed that St/St males were selectively favored over In/In males in both populations. No differences were observed between St/St and St/In karyotypes in either population. Frequency-dependent mating in the form of a rare male mating disadvantage for the In/In males tested against the St/St males in 731R was observed; the St/St males in this case showed a marginally significant rare male mating advantage. Thus, mating success as well as previously measured fecundity and fertility all indicate a selective advantage of the St chromosome over the In chromosome in both populations. This fitness relationship does not predict the equilibrium condition of 70-80% St/In, 20-30% In/In, and 0-10% St/St found in the DDT environment, whereas previously collected larval viability data and estimated adult survivorship do. In at least one population (731R), the adult mating success data do predict the dynamics of the polymorphism in the absence of DDT, whereas viability does not. These results, although limited to two populations under two environments (presence or absence of DDT), suggest that the relationship between adaptation to the environment under study and various components of fitness needs to be investigated fully before assessing which fitness components are most important in determining the effects of natural selection in specific populations.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
Mate Choice
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female...
Position-effect Variegation
Frequency-dependent Selection

