Evaluation of Low-Cost Mitigation Measures Implemented to Improve Air Quality in Nursery and Primary Schools

Juliana P Sá1, Pedro T B S Branco2, Maria C M Alvim-Ferraz3

  • 1LEPABE-Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. julianasa@fe.up.pt.

Insights

Low-cost measures improved indoor air quality in schools, significantly reducing carbon dioxide (CO₂). However, pollutant levels for PM2.5, PM10, and formaldehyde (CH₂O) often remained unsafe for children

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Indoor Air Quality Research
  • Pediatric Health

Background:

  • Indoor air pollution poses significant health risks, particularly to children in educational settings.
  • Children's prolonged indoor exposure in schools necessitates effective air quality management strategies.
  • Existing indoor air quality (IAQ) standards and recommendations often serve as benchmarks for health protection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of implemented low-cost mitigation measures in improving school indoor air quality.
  • To assess changes in pollutant concentrations before and after the application of air quality interventions.
  • To compare measured IAQ parameters against national legislation and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted two indoor air quality monitoring campaigns in nursery and primary schools.
  • Performed continuous measurements of various pollutants including CO₂, PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, CH₂O, VOCs, and radon.
  • Measured temperature and relative humidity, comparing pre- and post-mitigation data.

Main Results:

  • Exceedances of national and WHO limits were observed for PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, CO₂, and CH₂O in both campaigns.
  • Temperature and relative humidity levels frequently surpassed ASHRAE recommended ranges.
  • Post-mitigation measurements showed significant reductions in pollutant concentrations, especially for CO₂.

Conclusions:

  • Low-cost mitigation measures demonstrated a positive impact on indoor air quality, particularly for CO₂.
  • Despite improvements, the implemented measures were not consistently sufficient to ensure safe air quality levels.
  • Further interventions may be necessary to fully protect children's health from indoor air pollution in schools.