Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Phylogeny

Phylogeny

Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.

Survival Tree

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...

Speciation Rates

Speciation Rates

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

SEX RATIO CONSTANCY IN THE RED-WINGED BLACKBIRD.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017

Same author

THE ACCURACY OF PHYLOGENETIC ESTIMATION USING THE NEIGHBOR-JOINING METHOD.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017

Same author

The patterns of historical population movements in Europe and some of their genetic consequences.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2017

Same author

SELECTION AT TWO LEVELS IN HYBRID POPULATIONS OF MUSCA DOMESTICA.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017

Same author

THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC BACKGROUND ON THE ECOLOGY OF SELECTION IN TRIBOLIUM POPULATIONS.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017

Same author

TESTING INFERENCES ABOUT MICRO-EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES BY MEANS OF SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION ANALYSIS.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

FACTORS DETERMINING THE ACCURACY OF CLADOGRAM ESTIMATION: EVALUATION USING COMPUTER SIMULATION.

Kent L Fiala¹, Robert R Sokal¹

¹Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, 11794.

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution

|June 1, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Phylogenetic reconstruction accuracy is significantly impacted by evolutionary parameters and tree topology. Historical branching patterns, rather than biological factors, often determine how accurately phylogenies can be estimated.

More Related Videos

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Computational phylogenetics
Bioinformatics

Background:

Phylogenetic trees are crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships.
Accurate phylogenetic reconstruction is essential for biological research.
Several methods exist for inferring phylogenies, but their accuracy varies.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the accuracy of three phylogenetic inference methods: Wagner parsimony, character compatibility, and UPGMA clustering.
To investigate the impact of various evolutionary assumptions on phylogenetic reconstruction accuracy.
To identify key factors influencing the success of phylogenetic estimation.

Main Methods:

Development of a simulation model for phylogenesis.
Generation of numerous phylogenies and associated data matrices.
Assessment of taxonomic methods under varied evolutionary parameters (rate, direction, variation, topology).

Main Results:

Evolutionary parameters, except rate variation, significantly affected reconstruction accuracy.
Phylogenetic tree topology emerged as the most critical factor influencing accuracy.
Some phylogenies are inherently easier to estimate due to their historical branching patterns.

Conclusions:

The evaluated phylogenetic estimation methods exhibit limited accuracy.
Differences in accuracy among the methods are minimal.
Historical factors, specifically the branching pattern of a phylogeny, can be more influential than biological factors in reconstruction accuracy.