Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

09:10
Generation of Transgenic Hydra by Embryo Microinjection
Published on: September 11, 2014
14.8K
NATURAL SELECTION ON HYDROID COLONY MORPHOLOGY BY INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, 70148, USA.
Summary
Colonial hydroids in Hydractinia show genetically influenced, variable morphology. Intraspecific competition acts as a selective force, favoring certain morphologies over others in natural populations.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Marine Ecology
- Genetics
Background:
- Colonial hydroids of the genus Hydractinia exhibit significant morphological variation.
- This morphological variation is known to influence intraspecific competitive ability.
- Intraspecific competition is frequent in natural settings, implying it's a key selective pressure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the genetic basis of morphological variation in Hydractinia.
- To test the hypothesis that intraspecific competition is a selective force on morphology.
- To examine the relationship between morphology, competitive ability, and population dynamics.
Main Methods:
- A replicated common garden experiment was conducted to assess the genetic basis of morphological traits.
- Two datasets were analyzed: pre- and post-competition samples from juvenile and adult populations.
- Correlative analyses examined the relationship between morphology frequency and observed intraspecific competition rates across eight populations.
Main Results:
- A genetic basis for morphological variation in Hydractinia was confirmed.
- Morphologies with lower competitive ability were less abundant in adult (post-competition) samples compared to juvenile (pre-competition) samples.
- The relative frequencies of different morphologies correlated with the observed rates of intraspecific competition within populations.
Conclusions:
- Intraspecific competition acts as a selective agent on genetically based morphological variation in Hydractinia.
- The direction of selection observed in this species challenges current predictions based on cross-taxa comparisons.
- Inferences about past selection pressures based solely on present-day correlations across species may be limited.
Related Concept Videos
Competition
25.2K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
25.2K
Types of Selection
45.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
45.6K
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.3K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.3K
Speciation Rates
23.1K
Overview
23.1K
Limits to Natural Selection
35.6K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.6K
Predator-Prey Interactions
21.9K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.9K

