Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Direct and Simple Method to Assess Drosophila melanogaster's Viability from Embryo to Adult
Published on: August 27, 2019
THE GENETICS OF VIABILITY IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: EFFECTS OF INBREEDING AND ARTIFICIAL SELECTION
Nieves García1, Carlos López-Fanjul1, Aurora García-Dorado1
1Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract:
Inbreeding and artificial selection experiments were conducted to investigate the genetic properties of egg-to-pupa viability in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. The effect of different levels of inbreeding (F = 0, 0.25, 0.50, and 0.73) was studied. Up to F = 0.50, a linear depression of the mean viability was observed, accompanied by a significant increase of both within-line additive variance and between-line variance. At F = 0.73, no further changes were detected. This can be attributed to natural selection opposing high levels of homozygosity. In parallel, artificial selection to increase viability was performed for 27 generations in (1) a single undivided population (U) and (2) two populations with cycles of subdivision and between-line selection, followed by reconstitution of selected lines (SO and SI ). During the first cycle (generations 0-4), most of the final total response was achieved under all selection regimes. An advantage of the SO and SI strategies was observed after the completion of the first cycle. However, the same limit was reached in all cases because of a delayed response experienced by line U. Reverse selection for viability resulted in positive correlated responses for fecundity and mating success. Both inbreeding and selection results are compatible with the genetic variance of viability in the base population being generated by segregation at a few loci with substantial additive effects and several deleterious recessives at low initial frequencies. Possible reasons for the maintenance of that variance in natural populations are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Genetics of Speciation
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...

