Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

04:52
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
1.4K
EPISTASIS AND THE INCREASE IN ADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE: IMPLICATIONS FOR PHASE 1 OF WRIGHT'S SHIFTING-BALANCE
1Department of Zoology, University of Vermont, Marsh Life Science Building, Burlington, Vermont, 05405-0086.
Summary
Wright's shifting-balance theory explains how gene interactions and genetic drift can form adaptive gene complexes. Increased epistasis raises individual genetic variance, promoting allele reordering and complex formation.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Quantitative Genetics
- Population Genetics
Background:
- Wright's shifting-balance theory posits that genetic drift and selection in interacting gene systems create adaptive gene complexes.
- Existing genetic drift theory often assumes additive gene effects, potentially overlooking the impact of gene interactions.
- Wright emphasized the universality of gene interaction effects, suggesting additive models may be insufficient for evolutionary differentiation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of gene interactions, specifically epistasis, in Wright's shifting-balance theory.
- To model the variance in local breeding values (LBVs) and the covariance of LBVs between individuals within and across demes.
- To determine how epistasis influences the independent variation of individual LBVs and the potential for allele reordering.
Main Methods:
- Developed a model to analyze the variance in local breeding values (LBVs) of an individual.
- Examined the covariance in LBVs for pairs of individuals mated within the same deme versus different demes.
- Quantified the impact of increasing epistasis on the variance and covariance of LBVs.
Main Results:
- In purely additive models, the covariance of LBVs equals the variance in LBVs.
- Increasing epistasis elevates the variance in an individual's LBV while decreasing the covariance between paired individuals' LBVs.
- A larger divergence between variance and covariance indicates greater independent variation in LBVs, signifying potential allele reordering.
Conclusions:
- The study confirms a key aspect of Wright's shifting-balance theory: gene interactions facilitate allele reordering by genetic drift.
- This reordering, when combined with selection, is crucial for the formation of adaptive gene complexes.
- Non-additive gene effects (epistasis) are essential for understanding evolutionary processes beyond simple additive models.
Related Concept Videos
Epistasis Analysis
6.0K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
6.0K
Epistasis
50.6K
In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
50.6K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
76.9K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
76.9K
Position-effect Variegation
7.2K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
7.2K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
65.0K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
65.0K
Law of Segregation
78.6K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
78.6K

