Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

10:50
Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
Published on: November 8, 2018
11.6K
THE DARWIN-FISHER THEORY OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN MONOGAMOUS BIRDS
Mark Kirkpatrick1, Trevor Price2, Stevan J Arnold3
1Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712.
Summary
In monogamous birds, male traits evolve under sexual selection, but extreme traits are limited. This is due to constraints on sexual selection strength and the influence of male parental care.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Quantitative genetics
- Animal behavior
Background:
- Males in monogamous species often display secondary sexual traits that are less extreme than in polygynous species.
- Darwin and Fisher proposed a theory linking female breeding date, nutritional condition, and sexual selection.
- Understanding the evolution of male traits and female preferences in monogamy is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a quantitative-genetic model for the joint evolution of male secondary sexual traits, female mating preferences, and female breeding date.
- To investigate the constraints on the evolution of conspicuous male traits in monogamous systems.
- To explore the role of female breeding timing and nutritional condition in sexual selection.
Main Methods:
- Development of a quantitative-genetic model.
- Analysis of the interplay between male trait evolution, female preference, and female breeding date.
- Examination of equilibrium conditions for male traits and female preferences.
Main Results:
- Conspicuous male traits that may decrease survival can evolve in monogamous birds, but their evolution is constrained.
- The strength of sexual selection is limited, preventing extreme maladaptive evolution seen in polygynous systems.
- Male parental care can favor preferences for less conspicuous males, further limiting trait exaggeration.
- Sexual selection can occur independently of the nutritional effects proposed by Darwin and Fisher.
Conclusions:
- The Darwin-Fisher mechanism's assumptions are likely met in many monogamous bird species.
- Sexual selection in monogamous birds is constrained by factors limiting trait exaggeration.
- Additional mechanisms likely reinforce sexual selection, contributing to the evolution of male secondary sexual traits.
Related Concept Videos
Mate Choice
11.9K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
11.9K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
620
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
620
Types of Selection
45.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
45.6K
Fixed Action Patterns
17.8K
A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
17.8K
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.3K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.3K
Inclusive Fitness
42.9K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
42.9K

