CAENOGENESIS, DEVELOPMENTAL VARIABILITY, AND EVOLUTION IN THE CARPUS AND TARSUS OF THE MARBLED NEWT TRITURUS...

In this paper, after a comparative analysis of the development of Triturus marmoratus, we explore the existence of caenogenetic events and their ontogenetic and phylogenetic consequences. The adult morphology of the Triturus marmoratus limb, in terms of number and spatial arrangement of skeletal elements, agrees with the general pattern of urodeles. The congruence in the typical pattern of adult morphology does not hint at the striking differences in embryonic development. These differences can be summarized as follows: 1) Presence of a "central axis" that develops in a distal-to-proximal direction. It originates in the basale commune giving rise to the centrale and the intermedium. Thus, there is no postaxial branching as found in Ambystoma mexicanum. 2) Again, unlike in Ambystoma mexicanum, we find a postaxial structure composed of the ulnare (fibulare)-distal carpal (tarsal) 4-metacarpal (metatarsal) 4 which is independent of the "digital arch." 3) The (forelimb) digits, in particular, digits 1, 2, and 3, undergo disproportionate elongation. For example, the second digit, composed of a thin continuous, cartilaginous rod, becomes longer than the rest of the limb. Our study of the patterns of embryonic connectivity suggests the coexistence of three directions of growth and morphogenesis in the development of the Triturus marmoratus limb. 1) A proximo-distal one that gives rise to the preaxial axis, "primary axis," and individual digits. 2) An anterio-posterior axis of development that gives rise to the "digital arch" and determines the number of digits. 3) A disto-proximal central axis that originates in the basale commune and sequentially generates the centrale and the intermedium. We speculate that heterochronic interspecific variation in the time of onset of limb bud formation is related to the degree of precocious digital elongation. Selection for long extremities in early larval stages, associated with functional demands for locomotion and balancing, may be the cause for the above listed changes in developmental pattern. Thus, the reported system is an example of how selection during ontogeny can result in the evolution of the developmental process.