Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026
Isolation and Differentiation of Stromal Vascular Cells to Beige/Brite Cells
Published on: March 28, 2013
Oxidized Phospholipids and Risk of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: The Copenhagen General Population Study
Pia R Kamstrup1, Ming-Yow Hung2, Joseph L Witztum2
1From the Department of Clinical Biochemistry (P.R.K., B.G.N.) and the Copenhagen General Population Study (P.R.K., B.G.N.), Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (M.-Y.H., J.L.W., S.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine (M.-Y.H.) and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital (M.-Y.H.), Taipei Medical University, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan (M.-Y.H.); and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (B.G.N.). pia.roerbaek.kamstrup@regionh.dk stsimikas@ucsd.edu.
Objective:
Lipoprotein(a) is causally associated with calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). Lipoprotein(a) carries proinflammatory and procalcific oxidized phospholipids (OxPL). We tested whether the CAVD risk is mediated by the content of OxPL on lipoprotein(a).
Approach And Results:
A case-control study was performed within the Copenhagen General Population Study (n=87 980), including 725 CAVD cases (1977-2013) and 1413 controls free of cardiovascular disease. OxPL carried by apoB (apolipoprotein B-100; OxPL-apoB) or apolipoprotein(a) (OxPL-apo(a)) containing lipoproteins, lipoprotein(a) levels, LPA kringle IV type 2 repeat, and rs10455872 genetic variants were measured. OxPL-apoB and OxPL-apo(a) levels correlated with lipoprotein(a) levels among cases (r=0.75 and r=0.95; both P<0.001) and controls (r=0.65 and r=0.93; both P<0.001). OxPL-apoB levels associated with risk of CAVD with odds ratios of 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.0-1.6) for 34th to 66th percentile levels, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.2-2.1) for 67th to 90th percentile levels, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.3-3.0) for 91st to 95th percentile levels, and 3.4 (95% CI, 2.1-5.5) for levels >95th percentile, versus levels <34th percentile (trend, P<0.001). Corresponding odds ratios for OxPL-apo(a) were 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0-1.5), 1.2(95% CI, 0.9-1.6), 2.1(95% CI, 1.4-3.1), and 2.9(95% CI, 1.9-4.5; trend, P<0.001) and were similar for lipoprotein(a). LPA genotypes associated with OxPL-apoB, OxPL-apo(a), and lipoprotein(a) levels and explained 34%, 46%, and 39%, respectively, of the total variation in levels. LPA genotypes associated with risk of CAVD; a doubling in genetically determined OxPL-apoB, OxPL-apo(a), and lipoprotein(a) levels associated with odds ratio of CAVD of 1.18 (95% CI, 1.10-1.27), 1.09 (95% CI, 1.05-1.13), and 1.09 (95% CI, 1.05-1.14), respectively, comparable to the corresponding observational estimates of 1.27 (95% CI, 1.16-1.39), 1.13 (95% CI, 1.08-1.18), and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.17).
Conclusions:
OxPL-apoB and OxPL-apo(a) are novel genetic and potentially causal risk factors for CAVD and may explain the association of lipoprotein(a) with CAVD.
More Related Videos
09:18Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
Published on: December 15, 2023
12:15Single Liposome Measurements for the Study of Proton-Pumping Membrane Enzymes Using Electrochemistry and Fluorescent Microscopy
Published on: February 21, 2019