Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Adherence to surviving sepsis guidelines among pediatric intensivists. A national survey
Farah C Thabet1, Jihad N Zahraa, May S Chehab
1Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail. thabetfarah@yahoo.fr.
Insights
Pediatric intensivists in Saudi Arabia show high adherence to sepsis management guidelines. The primary barrier identified was the lack of a locally written protocol for sepsis care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Guideline Adherence
Background:
- Sepsis management in children requires adherence to established guidelines.
- The American College of Critical Care-Pediatric Advanced Life Support (ACCM-PALS) and Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) provide critical care recommendations.
- Assessing guideline compliance is crucial for optimizing pediatric sepsis outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate compliance with 2006 ACCM-PALS and 2012 SSC guidelines for pediatric sepsis management.
- To identify barriers hindering adherence to these pediatric sepsis guidelines.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study was conducted in Saudi Arabia.
- A web-based survey using a case scenario was distributed to pediatric intensivists.
- Adherence to ACCM-PALS and SSC guidelines was measured.
Main Results:
- High reported adherence to key sepsis management steps, including early antibiotics (94%) and fluid resuscitation (98%).
- 80% of intensivists fully adhered to the ACCM-PALS bundle components.
- Absence of a local protocol was cited as the main barrier by 50% of respondents.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric intensivists demonstrate good compliance with ACCM-PALS and SSC sepsis guidelines.
- Variability in guideline interpretation exists among practitioners.
- Developing local protocols is essential to overcome adherence barriers in pediatric sepsis management.
Objectives:
To assess the compliance with the 2006 American College of Critical Care-Pediatric Advanced Life Support (ACCM-PALS) guidelines for sepsis management, and the 2012 surviving sepsis campaign (SSC), for the management of pediatric patients with sepsis and to identify the main barriers to adherence to these guidelines. Methods: In November 2015, a prospective cohort study in which a web based electronic survey using a case scenario to explore the usual management of a child with severe sepsis was designed and sent to all consultant pediatric intensivists practicing in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Adherences to 2012 SSC guidelines and to 4 algorithmic time-specific goals outlined in the ACCM-PALS guidelines were measured. Results: Sixty-one (76%) of 80 consultant pediatric intensivists working in KSA responded to the survey. Of the 61 respondents, 94% reported administering antibiotics within one hour of the child presentation, 98% reported starting resuscitation by giving fluid boluses, 93% reported starting vasopressor if the patient remained hypotensive despite fluid resuscitation, and 86% reported they would start hydrocortisone in case of catecholamine refractory shock. In total, 80% of the intensivists reported full adherence to all of the 4 components in the ACCM-PALS bundle; 50% reported that the absence of a locally written protocol was the main barrier to adherence to the SSC guidelines. Conclusion: Pediatric intensivists reported good adherence to the 2006 ACCM-PALS guidelines and 2012 SSC guidelines with some variability in interpretation of the recommendations. The absence of a written protocol was the main reported barrier to adherence to these guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Standards of Care II
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Standards of Care I

