Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation

Mark Robson1, Seock-Ah Im1, Elżbieta Senkus1

  • 1From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.R.); Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland (E.S.); National Cancer Center-Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.), and the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun (W.L.) - both in China; Basser Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.M.D.); National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan (N.M.); Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (S.D.); Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (N.T.); Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester (A.A.), and AstraZeneca, Macclesfield (S.R.) - both in the United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD (W.W., C.G.); and University of Padua and Istituto Oncologico Veneto Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Padua, Italy (P.C.).

Abstract

Insights

Olaparib significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with BRCA-mutated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This PARP inhibitor offers a better option than standard chemotherapy for eligible patients.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Olaparib is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor.
  • It shows antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare olaparib monotherapy with standard chemotherapy.
  • To evaluate efficacy in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial was conducted.
  • Patients received either olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or physician's choice single-agent chemotherapy.
  • Progression-free survival was the primary end point.

Main Results:

  • Median progression-free survival was 7.0 months with olaparib vs. 4.2 months with standard therapy.
  • Response rate was 59.9% for olaparib versus 28.8% for standard therapy.
  • Grade 3 or higher adverse events were less frequent with olaparib (36.6%) compared to standard therapy (50.5%).

Conclusions:

  • Olaparib monotherapy offers significant benefit in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations.
  • It resulted in 2.8 months longer progression-free survival and a 42% lower risk of progression or death.
  • Olaparib is a superior treatment option compared to standard therapy for this patient population.

Related Concept Videos

Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.8K
Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
9.0K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
8.2K
Cancer Therapies02:49

Cancer Therapies

Cancer therapies are various modes of treatment, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy that are administered to cancer patients.
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
10.3K
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks02:37

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...
6.5K
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes01:05

Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes

Genes usually encode proteins necessary for the proper functioning of a healthy cell. Mutations can often cause changes to the gene expression pattern, thereby altering the phenotype.
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
9.9K