Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Reperfusion Options for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients with Expected Delays to Percutaneous Coronary
David M Larson1, Peter McKavanagh2, Timothy D Henry3
1University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, 920 East 28th Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA; Division of Cardiology, Ridgeview Medical Center, 500 South Maple Street, Waconia, MN 55387, USA.
Insights
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the top treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). When 24/7 PCI is unavailable, a pharmacoinvasive strategy or timely transfer is recommended for optimal patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the gold standard for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) reperfusion.
- Limited 24/7 PCI availability in US hospitals necessitates alternative strategies.
- Timely transfer and pharmacoinvasive approaches are crucial for STEMI management in non-PCI capable facilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the optimal reperfusion strategies for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the context of varying hospital PCI capabilities.
- To define the role of pharmacoinvasive strategies and rescue PCI in STEMI management.
- To emphasize the importance of organized regional STEMI systems for effective treatment delivery.
Main Methods:
- Review of current guidelines and evidence for STEMI reperfusion.
- Analysis of treatment pathways based on PCI availability and expected transfer delays.
- Description of pharmacoinvasive strategy implementation and indications for rescue PCI.
Main Results:
- Primary PCI is preferred, but transfer is optimal for non-PCI hospitals.
- A pharmacoinvasive strategy is recommended for delays >120 minutes.
- Rescue PCI for failed reperfusion/instability; routine PCI within 24 hours for others post-fibrinolysis.
Conclusions:
- Effective STEMI management requires a multi-faceted approach considering hospital resources.
- Organized regional STEMI systems with standardized protocols are essential for successful pharmacoinvasive strategy implementation.
- Prompt and appropriate reperfusion, whether primary PCI, transfer, or pharmacoinvasive, significantly impacts STEMI patient outcomes.
Abstract:
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, only one-third of hospitals in the US have PCI availability 24/7. For non-PCI hospitals, transfer remains the optimal strategy. For expected delays of greater than 120 minutes, a pharmacoinvasive strategy is recommended. In patients with evidence of failed reperfusion or hemodynamic instability, immediate rescue PCI should be performed. All other patients should undergo routine cardiac catheterization and PCI within 24 hours after fibrinolysis. A pharmacoinvasive strategy is best implemented within an organized regional STEMI system with prospective standardized transfer protocols.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

