Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
Variations in survival after cardiac arrest among academic medical center-affiliated hospitals
Michael Christopher Kurz1, John P Donnelly1,2,3, Henry E Wang1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Insights
Academic medical centers with higher cardiac arrest (CA) and surgical volumes, advanced cardiac facilities, and affluent patient populations demonstrate improved CA survival rates. These factors are key indicators for better patient outcomes in critical care settings.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Healthcare Management
- Public Health
Background:
- Survival rates after cardiac arrest (CA) vary significantly across healthcare institutions.
- Identifying institutional factors associated with CA survival is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine characteristics of academic medical centers (AMCs) linked to higher cardiac arrest survival rates.
- To compare institutional and community factors between AMCs with above-average and below-average CA survival.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 2012 discharge data from Vizient clinical database-resource manager for AMCs.
- Identification of cardiac arrest cases using ICD-9 codes (427.5 for CA, 99.60 for CPR).
- Estimation of hospital-specific risk-standardized survival rates (RSSRs) using mixed-effects logistic regression.
Main Results:
- Overall CA survival was 42.3% across 3,686,296 discharges, with a median institutional RSSR of 42.6%.
- AMCs with above-average survival (median RSSR 61.8%) had higher CA volume, more beds, and greater annual surgical volume compared to those with below-average survival (median RSSR 26.8%).
- High-survival AMCs were more likely to offer cardiac catheterization and cardiac surgery and served areas with higher household incomes and lower poverty rates.
Conclusions:
- Academic medical centers with higher cardiac arrest and surgical case volumes demonstrate superior risk-standardized CA survival.
- Availability of cardiac catheterization and cardiac surgery services is associated with better CA survival.
- Higher socioeconomic status of the patient catchment area correlates with improved CA survival rates in AMCs.
Background:
Variation exists in cardiac arrest (CA) survival among institutions. We sought to determine institutional-level characteristics of academic medical centers (AMCs) associated with CA survival.
Methods:
We examined discharge data from AMCs participating with Vizient clinical database-resource manager. We identified cases using ICD-9 diagnosis code 427.5 (CA) or procedure code 99.60 (CPR). We estimated hospital-specific risk-standardized survival rates (RSSRs) using mixed effects logistic regression, adjusting for individual mortality risk. Institutional and community characteristics of AMCs with higher than average survival were compared with those with lower survival.
Results:
We analyzed data on 3,686,296 discharges in 2012, of which 33,700 (0.91%) included a CA diagnosis. Overall survival was 42.3% (95% CI 41.8-42.9) with median institutional RSSR of 42.6% (IQR 35.7-51.0; Min-Max 19.4-101.6). We identified 28 AMCs with above average survival (median RSSR 61.8%) and 20 AMCs with below average survival (median RSSR 26.8%). Compared to AMCs with below average survival, those with high CA survival had higher CA volume (median 262 vs.119 discharges, p = 0.002), total beds (722 vs. 452, p = 0.02), and annual surgical volume (24,939 vs. 13,109, p<0.001), more likely to offer cardiac catheterization (100% vs. 72%, p = 0.007) or cardiac surgery (93% vs. 61%, p = 0.02) and cared for catchment areas with higher household income ($61,922 vs. $49,104, p = 0.004) and lower poverty rates (14.6% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.03).
Conclusion:
Using discharge data from Vizient, we showed AMCs with higher CA and surgical case volume, cardiac catheterization and cardiac surgery facilities, and catchment areas with higher socioeconomic status had higher risk-standardized CA survival.
More Related Videos
05:36Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care