Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.0K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

793
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
793

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LLMs are ideological chameleons: personalized echo chambers in the Brazilian political context.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Causality-driven feature representation for connectivity prediction.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Commercial wrist-worn wearable devices for older adults: a scoping review.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2025
Same author

Time-series visual representations for sleep stages classification.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The NeRF Signature: Codebook-Aided Watermarking for Neural Radiance Fields.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2025
Same author

Pixel-Inconsistency Modeling for Image Manipulation Localization.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2025
Same journal

Invaders taking over-Mollusc faunal change in volcanic barrier lakes of the Albertine Rift biodiversity hotspot.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

AI-driven molecular diversification and ligand-based optimization of macitentan derivatives targeting VEGFR1 and endothelin signaling pathways.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Performance patterns and records in the world aquatics masters championships: Where do the most frequently represented nations among the top-ten masters swimmers come from?

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Modeling diurnal Temperature-Rainfall relationships under multicollinearity using PLS-SEM: A case study of Ghana.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Organizational culture, social capital, and emergency capacity in primary healthcare institutions: A cross-sectional structural equation modeling study comparing ordinary and older communities.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Impact of kidney function on the metabolome in the general population.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.3K

History matching through dynamic decision-making.

Cristina C B Cavalcante1, Célio Maschio2, Antonio Alberto Santos2

  • 1Institute of Computing, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Plos One
|June 6, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a novel dynamic optimization framework for reservoir history matching. The approach uses machine learning to improve model accuracy with fewer simulations, enhancing reservoir management decisions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Reservoir Engineering
  • Machine Learning
  • Optimization

Background:

  • History matching is crucial for reservoir management, using uncertain model attributes to replicate real reservoir performance.
  • Accurate reservoir models inform critical decisions in economic analysis and production strategies.
  • Traditional methods can be computationally intensive, requiring numerous simulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a dynamic decision-making optimization framework for reservoir history matching.
  • To leverage machine learning for a data-driven approach to generate improved history-matched models.
  • To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the history matching process.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a dynamic optimization framework incorporating a 'learning-from-data' strategy.
  • Integrated two machine learning-based optimizer components: unsupervised learning and statistical analysis.
  • Utilized pattern recognition from available solution data to guide the generation of new models.
  • Applied the framework to the UNISIM-I-H benchmark model.

Main Results:

  • The dynamic decision-making optimization framework demonstrated improved quality of history matching solutions.
  • The proposed method achieved comparable or better results with a significantly reduced number of simulations compared to previous work.
  • Machine learning components effectively identified input attribute patterns linked to favorable reservoir responses.

Conclusions:

  • The dynamic decision-making optimization framework offers a more efficient and effective approach to reservoir history matching.
  • This data-driven, machine learning-enhanced methodology holds significant potential for advancing reservoir engineering practices.
  • The framework's ability to reduce simulation requirements presents a substantial advantage for practical reservoir management.