Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Comparative Effectiveness of Clinical-Community Childhood Obesity Interventions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Elsie M Taveras1,2, Richard Marshall3, Mona Sharifi4
1Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston.
Insights
Novel clinical and community interventions improved child BMI and family-centered outcomes. Both approaches enhanced parental resource empowerment, with one also improving child quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric obesity intervention research
- Clinical-community integrated care models
- Health-related quality of life in children
Background:
- Childhood obesity is a growing public health concern requiring innovative care delivery.
- Integrating clinical resources with community support may improve health outcomes.
- The Connect for Health Trial investigated such novel approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of two clinical-community interventions on child BMI z score.
- To assess the impact of these interventions on child health-related quality of life.
- To determine the effect on parental resource empowerment.
Main Methods:
- A 2-arm, blinded, randomized clinical trial involving 721 children (ages 2-12) with BMI ≥ 85th percentile.
- Interventions included enhanced primary care alone or enhanced primary care plus tailored health coaching.
- Outcomes measured at baseline and 1 year included BMI z score, quality of life, and parental empowerment.
Main Results:
- Both interventions showed improvements in BMI z score and parental resource empowerment.
- The enhanced primary care plus coaching group reported improved child health-related quality of life.
- No significant differences were found between the two intervention arms for most outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Clinical care packages combined with community resource linkages show promise for childhood obesity.
- These interventions positively impact family-centered outcomes and child BMI.
- Further research may clarify the differential benefits of added health coaching.
Importance:
Novel approaches to care delivery that leverage clinical and community resources could improve body mass index (BMI) and family-centered outcomes.
Objective:
To examine the extent to which 2 clinical-community interventions improved child BMI z score and health-related quality of life, as well as parental resource empowerment in the Connect for Health Trial.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This 2-arm, blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2014 through March 2016, with measures at baseline and 1 year after randomization. This intent-to-treat analysis included 721 children ages 2 to 12 years with BMI in the 85th or greater percentile from 6 primary care practices in Massachusetts.
Interventions:
Children were randomized to 1 of 2 arms: (1) enhanced primary care (eg, flagging of children with BMI ≥ 85th percentile, clinical decision support tools for pediatric weight management, parent educational materials, a Neighborhood Resource Guide, and monthly text messages) or (2) enhanced primary care plus contextually tailored, individual health coaching (twice-weekly text messages and telephone or video contacts every other month) to support behavior change and linkage of families to neighborhood resources.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
One-year changes in age- and sex-specific BMI z score, child health-related quality of life measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life 4.0, and parental resource empowerment.
Results:
At 1 year, we obtained BMI z scores from 664 children (92%) and family-centered outcomes from 657 parents (91%). The baseline mean (SD) age was 8.0 (3.0) years; 35% were white (n = 252), 33.3% were black (n = 240), 21.8% were Hispanic (n = 157), and 9.9% were of another race/ethnicity (n = 71). In the enhanced primary care group, adjusted mean (SD) BMI z score was 1.91 (0.56) at baseline and 1.85 (0.58) at 1 year, an improvement of -0.06 BMI z score units (95% CI, -0.10 to -0.02) from baseline to 1 year. In the enhanced primary care plus coaching group, the adjusted mean (SD) BMI z score was 1.87 (0.56) at baseline and 1.79 (0.58) at 1 year, an improvement of -0.09 BMI z score units (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 intervention arms (difference, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.03; P = .39). Both intervention arms led to improved parental resource empowerment: 0.29 units (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.35) higher in the enhanced primary care group and 0.22 units (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.28) higher in the enhanced primary care plus coaching group. Parents in the enhanced primary care plus coaching group, but not in the enhanced care alone group, reported improvements in their child's health-related quality of life (1.53 units; 95% CI, 0.51 to 2.56). However, there were no significant differences between the intervention arms in either parental resource empowerment (0.07 units; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.16) or child health-related quality of life (0.89 units; 95% CI, -0.56 to 2.33).
Conclusions And Relevance:
Two interventions that included a package of high-quality clinical care for obesity and linkages to community resources resulted in improved family-centered outcomes for childhood obesity and improvements in child BMI.
Trial Registration:
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02124460.
More Related Videos
06:13Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Obesity
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs