Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Off-pump Versus On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Graft Patency Assessment With Coronary Computed Tomographic
Nicolas Noiseux1, Louis-Mathieu Stevens, Carl Chartrand-Lefebvre
1*Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) †Division of Cardiac Surgery ‡Department of Radiology §Division of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC ∥Division of Cardiac Surgery, McMaster University #Population Health Research Institute (PHRI), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON ¶University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Graft patency after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was similar in this pilot study. This research confirms the feasibility of a large randomized trial to compare these CABG techniques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common surgical procedure.
- Assessing graft patency is crucial for long-term outcomes.
- Off-pump CABG aims to avoid cardiopulmonary bypass, but its graft patency compared to on-pump CABG requires further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare graft patency between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in a prospective multicenter pilot study.
- To assess the feasibility of conducting a large randomized trial (RCT) on CABG techniques.
- To evaluate the reliability of computed tomography angiography for assessing graft patency post-CABG.
Main Methods:
- Prospective recruitment of 157 patients undergoing either off-pump or on-pump CABG across 3 centers.
- Graft patency assessed 1 year post-surgery using ≥64-slice computed tomography angiography.
- Blinded assessment categorized patency as normal, ≥50% stenosis, or occlusion; multilevel modeling was used.
Main Results:
- The overall graft patency index was 89% for off-pump and 95% for on-pump CABG (P=0.09).
- No significant differences in patency were observed between arterial and vein grafts (92% for both).
- Graft patency was comparable across different target territories.
Conclusions:
- One-year graft patency rates were similar for both off-pump and on-pump CABG in this pilot study.
- The study demonstrates the feasibility of a large multicenter RCT to compare CABG techniques.
- Computed tomography angiography is a reliable tool for assessing CABG graft patency in large trials.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

