Estimating National-Level Exposure to Antineoplastic Agents in the Workplace: CAREX Canada Findings and Future

Amy L Hall1, Paul A Demers2, George Astrakianakis1

  • 1School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada.

Abstract

Insights

Approximately 75,000 Canadians, primarily women, face occupational exposure to antineoplastic agents. This study highlights the need for better data on exposure levels and locations to improve worker safety.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Environmental Health
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Occupational exposure to antineoplastic agents poses risks including cancer and reproductive issues.
  • Data on the prevalence and location of such exposures is lacking in Canada.
  • CAREX Canada was initiated to address this data gap.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate the prevalence of occupational exposure to antineoplastic agents in Canada.
  • To identify the relative levels of exposure across different work settings, occupations, and sexes.
  • To provide data for risk assessment and prevention strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Defined exposure as any potential worker contact with antineoplastic agents.
  • Utilized worker population data from professional bodies, Census, and HR reports.
  • Estimated prevalence by combining population data with literature-based exposure proportions.
  • Assessed exposure levels (low, moderate, high) qualitatively based on contact frequency and controls.

Main Results:

  • An estimated 75,000 Canadians (0.42% of the workforce) are occupationally exposed.
  • Over 75% of exposed workers are female.
  • Community pharmacy workers represent the largest exposed group (30,200).
  • Non-hospital settings account for 52% of exposed workers.
  • The majority (75%) of exposed workers fall into the moderate exposure category.

Conclusions:

  • The findings can guide the identification of high-risk groups and inform disease burden estimations.
  • Results support targeted research and prevention efforts for antineoplastic agent exposure.
  • A need exists for more quantitative data on contamination and exposure, especially in emerging use settings.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
503
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
65
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
2.1K