Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Data sets for author name disambiguation: an empirical analysis and a new resource
Mark-Christoph Müller1, Florian Reitz2, Nicolas Roy3
1Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract:
Data sets of publication meta data with manually disambiguated author names play an important role in current author name disambiguation (AND) research. We review the most important data sets used so far, and compare their respective advantages and shortcomings. From the results of this review, we derive a set of general requirements to future AND data sets. These include both trivial requirements, like absence of errors and preservation of author order, and more substantial ones, like full disambiguation and adequate representation of publications with a small number of authors and highly variable author names. On the basis of these requirements, we create and make publicly available a new AND data set, SCAD-zbMATH. Both the quantitative analysis of this data set and the results of our initial AND experiments with a naive baseline algorithm show the SCAD-zbMATH data set to be considerably different from existing ones. We consider it a useful new resource that will challenge the state of the art in AND and benefit the AND research community.
Related Concept Videos
Pedigree Analysis
Affinity and Avidity
Law of Independent Assortment
Pleiotropy
Deductive Reasoning
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
Multiple Allele Traits

