Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Macrophage Differentiation and Polarization into an M2-Like Phenotype using a Human Monocyte-Like THP-1 Leukemia Cell Line
Published on: August 2, 2021
THP-1 and human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived macrophages differ in their capacity to polarize in vitro
Hiromi Shiratori1, Carmen Feinweber1, Sonja Luckhardt1
1Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Project Group Translational Medicine and Pharmacology TMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Abstract:
Macrophages (Mφ) undergo activation to pro-inflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory (M2) phenotypes in response to pathophysiologic stimuli and dysregulation of the M1-M2 balance is often associated with diseases. Therefore, studying mechanisms of macrophage polarization may reveal new drug targets. Human Mφ polarization is generally studied in primary monocyte-derived Mφ (PBMC Mφ) and THP-1-derived Mφ (THP-1 Mφ). We compared the polarization profile of THP-1 Mφ with that of PBMC Mφ to assess the alternative use of THP-1 for polarization studies. Cellular morphology, the expression profiles of 18 genes and 4 cell surface proteins, and phagocytosis capacity for apoptotic cells and S. aureus bioparticles were compared between these Mφ, activated towards M1, M2a, or M2c subsets by stimulation with LPS/IFNγ, IL-4, or IL-10, respectively, for 6h, 24h and 48h. The Mφ types are unique in morphology and basal expression of polarization marker genes, particularly CCL22, in a pre-polarized state, and were differentially sensitive to polarization stimuli. Generally, M1 markers were instantly induced and gradually decreased, while M2 markers were markedly expressed at a later time. Expression profiles of M1 markers were similar between the polarized Mφ types, but M2a cell surface markers demonstrated an IL-4-dependent upregulation only in PBMC Mφ. Polarized THP-1 Mφ but not PBMC Mφ showed distinctive phagocytic capacity for apoptotic cells and bacterial antigens, respectively. In conclusion, our data suggest that THP-1 may be useful for performing studies involving phagocytosis and M1 polarization, rather than M2 polarization.
Insights
This study compares human macrophage (Mφ) polarization using THP-1 cells versus primary cells. THP-1 cells are suitable for M1 polarization and phagocytosis studies, but less so for M2 polarization research.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Macrophages (Mφ) exhibit pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) phenotypes, crucial for immune responses.
- Dysregulation of macrophage polarization is linked to various diseases, highlighting the need for effective research models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the polarization capabilities of THP-1-derived Mφ with primary peripheral blood monocyte-derived Mφ (PBMC Mφ).
- To evaluate THP-1 Mφ as an alternative model for studying macrophage polarization, particularly M1 and M2 subsets.
Main Methods:
- Compared cellular morphology, gene expression (18 genes), and cell surface protein expression (4 proteins) of THP-1 Mφ and PBMC Mφ.
- Stimulated Mφ towards M1, M2a, and M2c phenotypes using LPS/IFNγ, IL-4, and IL-10, respectively, at 6h, 24h, and 48h.
- Assessed phagocytic capacity for apoptotic cells and S. aureus bioparticles.
Main Results:
- THP-1 Mφ and PBMC Mφ exhibited distinct basal marker expression and differential sensitivity to polarization stimuli.
- M1 marker expression was rapid and transient, while M2 markers showed delayed but sustained expression.
- THP-1 Mφ demonstrated superior phagocytic capacity for apoptotic cells and bacterial antigens, whereas PBMC Mφ showed IL-4-dependent M2a marker upregulation.
Conclusions:
- THP-1 Mφ are a viable model for studying M1 macrophage polarization and phagocytosis.
- THP-1 Mφ are less suitable for M2 polarization studies compared to PBMC Mφ.

