The PRECIS-2 tool has good interrater reliability and modest discriminant validity
Kirsty Loudon1, Merrick Zwarenstein2, Frank M Sullivan3
1Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Unit 13 Scion House, University of Stirling Innovation Park, Stirling FK9 4NF, UK.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|June 13, 2017
Summary
The PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS)-2 tool shows good reliability and validity for assessing clinical trial design. This tool helps differentiate between pragmatic and explanatory trial approaches, aiding researchers in trial planning.
Area of Science:
- Clinical trial methodology
- Health services research
Background:
- The PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS)-2 is a tool designed to enhance understanding of clinical trial designs.
- Previous versions have aimed to guide trialists, but validation of its psychometric properties is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the PRECIS-2 tool by assessing its discriminant validity and interrater reliability.
- To confirm its utility in distinguishing between pragmatic and explanatory trial approaches.
Main Methods:
- PRECIS-2 was developed with input from over 80 international experts to ensure face and content validity.
- Interrater reliability was assessed using 19 experienced trialists scoring 15 randomized controlled trial protocols.
- Discriminant validity was tested by evaluating the tool's ability to differentiate between pragmatic and explanatory trial designs.
Main Results:
- Generally good interrater reliability was observed, with seven of nine domains showing an intraclass correlation coefficient above 0.65.
- While flexibility (adherence) and recruitment domains had wider confidence intervals, all nine domains demonstrated better-than-chance discrimination between pragmatic and explanatory trial approaches.
- Raters identified a need for more information on specific domains like flexibility and recruitment.
Conclusions:
- The PRECIS-2 tool demonstrates acceptable validity and reliability for assessing clinical trial design.
- Further guidance and an accompanying website are available to support users.
- Ongoing testing by trial teams, systematic reviewers, and funders will continue to refine its application.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
14.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.2K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
1.1K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.1K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
1.5K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Sensitivity is the...
1.5K
Fisher's Exact Test
1.3K
Fisher's exact test is a statistical significance test widely used to analyze 2x2 contingency tables, particularly in situations where sample sizes are small. Unlike the chi-squared test, which approximates P-values and assumes minimum expected frequencies of at least five in each cell, Fisher's exact test calculates the exact probability (P-value) of observing the data or more extreme results under the null hypothesis. This feature makes it especially valuable when the assumptions of...
1.3K
Self-Report Tests of Personality
1.1K
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
1.1K
Two-Way ANOVA
3.5K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
3.5K


