Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

CRISPR and crRNAs02:53

CRISPR and crRNAs

19.4K
Bacteria and archaea are susceptible to viral infections just like eukaryotes; therefore, they have developed a unique adaptive immune system to protect themselves. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) are present in more than 45% of known bacteria and 90% of known archaea.
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
19.4K
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing01:28

CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

2.2K
The CRISPR-Cas system serves as a bacterial defense mechanism against invading genetic elements such as viruses and plasmids, forming the foundation for its adaptation as a powerful genome-editing tool. Originally discovered in prokaryotes, this system has been repurposed to revolutionize genetic engineering across a wide range of organisms, including plants, animals, and humans. The core component, Cas9, is an endonuclease derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, capable of introducing...
2.2K
CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

58.3K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
58.3K
The Antiviral System of Bacteria and Archaea: CRISPR01:23

The Antiviral System of Bacteria and Archaea: CRISPR

830
CRISPR stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats is a adaptive immune system found in bacteria and archaea that protects against viral infections. This system enables prokaryotic cells to identify, remember, and neutralize foreign genetic elements, primarily bacteriophages, by storing fragments of the invader’s DNA as a genetic memory.The CRISPR immune response begins during an initial infection. Cas (CRISPR-associated) proteins play a central role in this...
830
Homologous Recombination02:31

Homologous Recombination

64.4K
The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...
64.4K
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

12.0K
Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methanonatronarchaeum thermophilum gen. nov., sp. nov. and 'Candidatus Methanohalarchaeum thermophilum', extremely halo(natrono)philic methyl-reducing methanogens from hypersaline lakes comprising a new euryarchaeal class Methanonatronarchaeia classis nov.

International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology·2018
Same author

Bioinformatics Meets Virology: The European Virus Bioinformatics Center's Second Annual Meeting.

Viruses·2018
Same author

Taxonomy of the family Arenaviridae and the order Bunyavirales: update 2018.

Archives of virology·2018
Same author

Evolution of Genome Architecture in Archaea: Spontaneous Generation of a New Chromosome in Haloferax volcanii.

Molecular biology and evolution·2018
Same author

Estimation of universal and taxon-specific parameters of prokaryotic genome evolution.

PloS one·2018
Same author

Vast diversity of prokaryotic virus genomes encoding double jelly-roll major capsid proteins uncovered by genomic and metagenomic sequence analysis.

Virology journal·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems
11:53

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems

Published on: September 8, 2012

28.1K

Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems.

Eugene V Koonin1, Kira S Makarova1, Feng Zhang2

  • 1National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.

Current Opinion in Microbiology
|June 13, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This article reviews the vast variety of CRISPR-Cas immune systems found in bacteria and archaea. It explains how these systems are categorized into two main classes based on their protein structures and details how they have evolved over time.

Keywords:
microbial immunitygenomic architectureeffector complexesadaptive immunity

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

CRISPR/Cas12a Multiplex Genome Editing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Creation of Yeast Pixel Art
10:18

CRISPR/Cas12a Multiplex Genome Editing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Creation of Yeast Pixel Art

Published on: May 28, 2019

17.9K
Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells
11:35

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2017

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems
11:53

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems

Published on: September 8, 2012

28.1K
CRISPR/Cas12a Multiplex Genome Editing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Creation of Yeast Pixel Art
10:18

CRISPR/Cas12a Multiplex Genome Editing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Creation of Yeast Pixel Art

Published on: May 28, 2019

17.9K
Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells
11:35

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2017

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology and CRISPR-Cas systems evolution
  • Genomic architecture and molecular biology

Background:

Researchers remain uncertain about the full extent of diversity within prokaryotic adaptive immune mechanisms. Prior research has shown that these defense pathways exhibit significant variation in their genetic organization and protein components. No prior work had resolved the complete evolutionary trajectory of these complex molecular machines across diverse microbial species. That uncertainty drove the need for a systematic classification framework to organize these findings. Existing models often struggle to account for the rapid discovery of novel effector modules. This gap motivated a comprehensive assessment of how these systems adapt to environmental pressures. Scientists have long observed that these mechanisms protect cells from invading genetic material. Understanding these pathways requires integrating structural data with genomic sequence information to map their historical development.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to synthesize current knowledge regarding the classification and evolutionary history of prokaryotic adaptive immune systems. Researchers sought to address the challenges posed by the rapid discovery of novel CRISPR-Cas variants. This work addresses the need for a unified framework to organize the vast diversity of these molecular defense mechanisms. The study explores how different protein compositions and genomic architectures contribute to the functional variety of these systems. The authors intended to clarify the distinction between Class 1 and Class 2 systems through structural analysis. This effort was motivated by the identification of unique variants that challenge existing models of immune function. The researchers aimed to map the evolutionary origins of these systems by examining their relationship with mobile genetic elements. This synthesis provides a foundation for understanding the complex mechanisms of adaptation and interference in microbial populations.

Main Methods:

The review approach involved synthesizing genomic data from diverse bacterial and archaeal species to categorize immune pathways. Investigators examined the structural composition of effector complexes to distinguish between different system types. This strategy relied on comparing genetic locus architecture across various microbial genomes. Researchers utilized computational tools to identify patterns in protein sequences and functional domains. The analysis focused on mapping the evolutionary relationships between distinct CRISPR variants. Scientists integrated experimental findings to validate the functional roles of newly identified protein modules. This methodology allowed for the systematic classification of systems based on their unique molecular characteristics. The team synthesized existing literature to provide a comprehensive overview of how these defense mechanisms have diversified over time.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature reveal that these immune systems are organized into two distinct classes based on their effector structure. The researchers identified two new types and several subtypes within the Class 2 category through concerted genomic efforts. The newly characterized Type VI systems demonstrate a unique capability by exclusively targeting RNA molecules. Data indicate that some Class 2 effector proteins also manage the processing of pre-crRNA. Comparative studies suggest that Class 2 systems arose from mobile genetic elements on multiple independent occasions. The analysis highlights significant variation in protein composition and genome locus architecture across these defense pathways. These results demonstrate that the diversity of these systems is far greater than previously recognized in earlier studies. The findings confirm that structural differences in effector complexes serve as a reliable basis for classifying these adaptive immune mechanisms.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the two distinct classes represent fundamental differences in how these immune systems function. Synthesis and implications suggest that Class 2 systems likely originated from mobile genetic elements through repeated evolutionary events. These findings highlight the remarkable flexibility of prokaryotic defense strategies in response to viral threats. The researchers suggest that the ability of single proteins to perform multiple tasks represents a significant shift in our understanding of molecular efficiency. This review indicates that RNA-targeting variants expand the functional repertoire of known immune pathways. The evidence points toward a complex history of horizontal gene transfer shaping these diverse architectures. These insights provide a clearer picture of how microbial immunity adapts to changing ecological niches. Future investigations may build upon this classification to explore the broader implications for genome engineering technologies.

The authors propose that Class 2 systems evolved from mobile genetic elements on multiple independent occasions. This mechanism contrasts with Class 1 systems, which utilize multi-subunit effector complexes to achieve immunity.

These systems are categorized into two classes based on their effector architecture. Class 1 utilizes multi-subunit complexes, whereas Class 2 relies on single-protein modules to facilitate immune responses.

The researchers identify Type VI systems as the first variants known to exclusively target RNA. This functional specialization differs from other types that primarily interact with DNA sequences.

The authors note that in certain Class 2 systems, the effector protein itself handles pre-crRNA processing. This dual functionality is not observed in systems where separate enzymes manage RNA maturation.

Comparative analysis of effector complexes reveals that Class 2 systems emerged through independent evolutionary paths. This finding contrasts with the more stable structural configurations observed in Class 1 systems.

The authors suggest that the diversity of these systems reflects a broad range of adaptive strategies. This implies that microbial immunity is highly dynamic, unlike static defense mechanisms found in other organisms.