Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026
Modeling Osteosarcoma Using Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Patient-derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Published on: June 13, 2018
Prognostic factors and outcome of Liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years
Carolin Knebel1, Ulrich Lenze2, Florian Pohlig2
1Department of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. carolin.knebel@tum.de.
Background:
Soft tissue sarcomas are rare entities with over 50 histological subtypes. Liposarcoma (LS) is the most common neoplasm in this group; it is a complex neoplasm that is divided into different histological subtypes. Different therapy options, such as surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy, are available. Depending on the subtype, location, status of the resection margins and metastatic status, different therapy options are used. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors influencing the survival of patients affected by LS with consideration for the grading, histological subtype, state of the resection margin, size, location, metastases and local recurrence in a retrospective, single-centre analysis over 15 years.
Methods:
We included 133 patients (male/female = 67/66) in this study. We recorded the histologic subtype, grade, TNM classification, localization, biopsy technique, tumour margins, number of operations, complications, radiation and dose, chemotherapy, survival, recrudescence, metastases and follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed.
Results:
We detected 56 (43%; 95%-CI 34.6-51.6%) atypical LS cases, 21 (16.2%; 95%-CI 9.8-22.5) dedifferentiated LS cases, 40 (30.8%; 95%-CI 22.8-38.7) myxoid LS cases and 12 (9.2%; 95%-CI 4.3-14.2) pleomorphic LS cases. G1 was the most common grade, which was followed by G3. Negative margins (R0) were detected in 67 cases (53.6%; 95%-CI 44.9-62.3) after surgical resection. Local recurrence was detected in 23.6% of cases. The presence of metastases and dedifferentiated LS subtype as well as negative margins, grade and tumour size are significant prognostic factors of the survival rates (p < 0.015).
Conclusion:
Grading, LS subtype, negative margins after surgery, metastases and tumour size are independently associated with disease-specific survival, and patients with local recurrence had lower survival rates. We hope our investigation may facilitate a further prospective study and clinical decision-making in LS.
