Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

A Human Fallopian Tube Model for Investigation of C. trachomatis Infections
Published on: August 11, 2012
Biological and Behavioral Factors Associated With Positive Chlamydia Retests
Kirsty S Smith1, Rebecca Guy, Jennifer Danielewski
1From the *Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney; †Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; ‡Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital; §Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne; ¶Melbourne Sexual Health Centre; ∥Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; **Sydney Sexual Health Centre; ††School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Australia; ‡‡Serology and Virology Division, (SAViD) SEALS Microbiology, Prince of Wales Hospital; §§SOMS and BABS, UNSW Australia, Sydney; ¶¶VCS Pathology; and ∥∥Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Background:
Repeat chlamydia detection after treatment is common, and there is concern that treatment failure may be a cause.
Methods:
Within a randomized trial, we established a prospective cohort of 600 participants with anogenital chlamydia diagnoses (200 each of women, heterosexual men, and men who have sex with men [MSM]). Participants were invited for repeat testing at 3 months and to complete a behavioral survey at 4 months. Positive samples were analyzed for organism DNA load and genovar. We estimated repeat chlamydia positivity, reinfection and treatment failure rates, and investigated the biological and behavioral factors associated with a repeat positive test.
Results:
A total of 290 participants (100 women, 89 heterosexual men, 101 MSM) were retested at 1 to 4 months, with 43 repeat positives, including 26 classed as reinfection and 9 as treatment failures. Comparing MSM with heterosexual men and women combined, repeat positivity was higher (20.8% vs 11.6%, P = 0.04), and treatment failure was higher (6.9% vs 1.1%, P = 0.01), but there was no difference in reinfection rates (11.9% vs 7.4%, P = 0.21). Among MSM, the odds of repeat positivity increased by 90% with each additional log organism load in the original specimen (baseline) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.2). Among heterosexuals, the odds of repeat positivity decreased by 10% with each additional week delay in being retested for chlamydia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-0.9).
Conclusions:
Positive retests were more common among MSM than heterosexuals. Treatment failure was more common in MSM with rectal chlamydia, reinforcing concerns about azithromycin treatment failure.
Related Concept Videos
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Bacterial Phylum Chlamydiae
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia

