Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

05:37
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
2.7K
Predicting Infectious ComplicatioNs in Children with Cancer: an external validation study
Gabrielle M Haeusler1,2,3,4, Karin A Thursky2,5,6,7, Francoise Mechinaud8
1The Paediatric Integrated Cancer Service, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
British Journal of Cancer
|June 14, 2017
Summary
The Predicting Infectious ComplicatioNs in Children with Cancer (PICNICC) clinical decision rule showed lower accuracy for predicting infection in children with cancer and fever/neutropenia upon initial presentation. However, its performance improved for bloodstream infections and after overnight observation, suggesting potential for safe, cost-saving low-risk pathways.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Decision Rules
Background:
- Fever and neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer poses a significant risk of serious infection.
- Accurate prediction of microbiologically documented infection (MDI) is crucial for appropriate management.
- The Predicting Infectious ComplicatioNs in Children with Cancer (PICNICC) clinical decision rule (CDR) was developed to aid in this prediction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the PICNICC CDR for predicting MDI in Australian children with cancer experiencing FN.
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of current FN management strategies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective collection of data from 650 FN episodes, including demographics, outcomes, and costs.
- Assessment of the PICNICC CDR's discrimination, calibration, sensitivity, and specificity.
- Comparison of the CDR's performance in the validation cohort versus its derivation dataset.
Main Results:
- The PICNICC CDR performed poorly upon initial presentation without recalibration (AUC-ROC 0.638).
- Recalibration and application at day 2, considering known MDI proportions, improved sensitivity to 87.7%.
- Predictive ability for bacteraemia was similar to the derivation study, especially after recalibration (AUC-ROC 0.71).
- Length of stay significantly contributes to FN treatment costs (AUD 2183/day).
Conclusions:
- The PICNICC CDR requires local recalibration for optimal performance in predicting MDI in this cohort.
- The rule shows promise for identifying low-risk patients after a short observation period, potentially reducing healthcare costs.
- Implementing a low-risk pathway using the PICNICC CDR after inpatient observation may be safe and cost-effective.

