Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.2K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

2.0K
2.0K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.7K
2.7K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

9.1K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
9.1K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.2K
3.2K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.4K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinct 2-phenylimidazo[1,2-<i>a</i>]pyridine derivatives that inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation identified as AHR ligands.

iScience·2026
Same author

Examining Genetic Variants Associated with FOXP1 Syndrome through Molecular Dynamics of Its DNA-Binding Domain and Self-Organizing Maps.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Correction: Mechanism of RGD-conjugated nanodevice binding to its target protein integrin α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub> by atomistic molecular dynamics and machine learning.

Nanoscale·2026
Same author

Mechanistic snapshots of lipid-linked sugar transfer.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

SOMMD: an R package for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations using self-organizing map.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Author Correction: An abundant ginger compound furanodienone alleviates gut inflammation via the xenobiotic nuclear receptor PXR in mice.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.4K

Modeling Binding with Large Conformational Changes: Key Points in Ensemble-Docking Approaches.

Stefano Motta1, Laura Bonati1

  • 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca , Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milan, Italy.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|June 16, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study shows ensemble-docking accurately predicts ligand-protein complex structures by carefully selecting methods based on protein motion and binding mechanisms, like conformational selection and induced fit.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.2K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.4K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.2K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Biology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Protein dynamics are crucial for ligand binding and molecular recognition.
  • Understanding protein motion is key to accurate prediction of binding geometry.
  • Ensemble-docking approaches require careful methodological choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate critical choices in ensemble-docking for predicting ligand-protein binding geometry.
  • To investigate ligand-binding processes involving large protein conformational changes.
  • To compare conformational selection and induced-fit mechanisms in two distinct binding systems.

Main Methods:

  • Ensemble-docking technique applied to apo protein simulations.
  • Accelerated molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for conformational sampling.
  • Geometric clustering strategy for binding site conformation selection.
  • Case studies: acetylcholine binding protein and allose binding protein.

Main Results:

  • Ensemble-docking reliably predicts ligand-protein complex structures with appropriate methodological choices.
  • Accelerated MD simulations effectively sample conformations across high energy barriers when parameters are optimized.
  • Geometric clustering efficiently identifies relevant binding site conformations from MD trajectories.
  • Ligand-induced protein flexibility requires specific strategies in docking and pose refinement.

Conclusions:

  • Ensemble-docking is a reliable method for predicting ligand-protein complex structures.
  • Methodological choices in ensemble-docking must align with specific protein dynamics and binding mechanisms.
  • Accelerated MD and geometric clustering are valuable tools for conformational sampling and selection in binding studies.