Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

4.1K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
4.1K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

586
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
586
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

4.3K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
4.3K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

987
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
987
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

4.0K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.0K
Mason's Rule01:20

Mason's Rule

1.2K
Mason's rule is a powerful tool in control systems and signal processing. It simplifies the calculation of transfer functions from signal-flow graphs. This method leverages various elements, including loop gains, forward-path gains, and non-touching loops, to determine the transfer function efficiently.
Loop gain is determined by identifying and tracing a path from a node back to itself. This involves computing the product of branch gains along the loop. Each loop's gain is crucial for further...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Book Essay: Perspectives on Aging: Countering Ageism in Psychoanalytic ThoughtMidlife: Humanity's Secret Weapon. By <i>Andrew Jamieson</i>. Burneside, UK: Notting Hill Editions, 2022, 144 pp., $19.95 hardcover.Psychoanalysis of Aging and Maturity: The Concept of Maturescence. By <i>Guillermo Julio Montero</i>. Abington, UK: Routledge, 2020, 144 pp., $34.49 paperback.Blooming in December: Psychodynamic Psychotherapy With Older Adults. By <i>Amy Schaffer</i>. Abington, UK: Routledge, 2021, 119 pp., $27.24 paperback.Breaking the Age Code: How Your Beliefs About Aging Determine How Long and Well You Live. By <i>Becca Levy</i>. New York: HarperCollins, 2022, 294 pp., $15.99 paperback.Life Reimagined: The Science, Art, and Opportunity of Midlife. By <i>Barbara Bradley Hagerty</i>. New York: Riverhead, 2016, 451 pp., $24.00 paperback.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2026
Same author

Introduction to the Special Section on the Goldwater Rule.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2017
Same author

Goldwater v. Ginzburg.

The American journal of psychiatry·2015
Same journal

National Survey of Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education Exposure to Correctional Psychiatry.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Pregnancy Criminalization in the United States.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

In Reply.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Letter.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Practice Resource for Managing Violence in State Hospitals with Forensic Patients.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Plea Bargaining Participation and Competency Evaluation Considerations.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason&#180;s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K

Interpreting the Goldwater Rule.

John Martin-Joy1

  • 1Dr. Martin-Joy is Staff Psychiatrist, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA; Codirector, PGY-3 Adult Development Seminar, Harvard Longwood Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Boston, MA, and Instructor in Psychiatry, Part Time, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Brief portions of this material were presented as an introduction to "Ethical Perspectives on the Psychiatric Evaluation of Public Figures," an invited Forum in the Penn/Scattergood Ethics Track, 168th annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Toronto, Ontario, May 18, 2015. jmartin1@mah.harvard.edu.

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|June 17, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Goldwater Rule (Section 7.3) on psychiatric commentary about public figures is ambiguous. Its narrow interpretation by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) raises ethical concerns, necessitating a new integrated theory for consent-absent settings.

More Related Videos

High-Resolution Quantitative Immunogold Analysis of Membrane Receptors at Retinal Ribbon Synapses
09:24

High-Resolution Quantitative Immunogold Analysis of Membrane Receptors at Retinal Ribbon Synapses

Published on: February 18, 2016

7.9K
Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason&#180;s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K
High-Resolution Quantitative Immunogold Analysis of Membrane Receptors at Retinal Ribbon Synapses
09:24

High-Resolution Quantitative Immunogold Analysis of Membrane Receptors at Retinal Ribbon Synapses

Published on: February 18, 2016

7.9K
Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Psychiatry
  • Professional Conduct

Background:

  • Section 7.3 of the Principles of Medical Ethics, known as the Goldwater Rule, governs psychiatric commentary on public figures without their consent.
  • The rule's wording is ambiguous, leading to varied interpretations and ethical debates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the ambiguity of the Goldwater Rule (Section 7.3).
  • To examine the implications of narrow versus broad interpretations of the rule.
  • To investigate the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) stance on Section 7.3.
  • To advocate for an integrated theory of psychiatric ethics for situations lacking patient consent.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the wording and historical context of Section 7.3.
  • Review of the APA's interpretations and public statements regarding the Goldwater Rule.
  • Examination of ethical implications across different professional settings (media, courts, government, academia).

Main Results:

  • The Goldwater Rule's text is open to both narrow and broad interpretations.
  • A narrow reading, favored by the APA, permits commentary in institutional settings but not media, potentially weakening the rule's ethical force.
  • A broad reading renders many psychiatric professional activities ethically questionable.
  • Disagreement over the rule's scope persists, causing public confusion.

Conclusions:

  • The current interpretation of the Goldwater Rule is inconsistent and ethically problematic.
  • There is a critical need for a unified ethical theory to guide psychiatrists in situations where patient interview and consent are not feasible.
  • Revising Section 7.3 based on an integrated ethical framework is essential to clarify professional conduct and reduce ambiguity.