Impact and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh

Clint Pecenka1, Umesh Parashar2, Jacqueline E Tate2

  • 1PATH, 2201 Westlake Ave, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.

Vaccine
|June 18, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Introducing rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh is highly cost-effective, preventing thousands of deaths and hospitalizations annually. The program offers significant public health benefits, even without subsidies, demonstrating its value for child survival.

Area of Science:

  • Global Health
  • Vaccinology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Diarrheal disease is a major global child mortality cause, with rotavirus responsible for over a third of deaths.
  • In 2013, rotavirus caused an estimated 215,000 deaths in children under five, disproportionately affecting Asia.
  • Bangladesh, despite high rotavirus burden, had not yet introduced rotavirus vaccination but planned for 2018.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh.
  • To estimate the costs associated with a rotavirus vaccination program.
  • To provide data for decision-makers regarding rotavirus vaccine introduction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Pan American Health Organization's TRIVAC model (version 2.0) for analysis.
  • Compared nationwide introduction of a two-dose rotavirus vaccine in 2017 versus no vaccination.
  • Assessed three mortality scenarios (low, high, midpoint) from a societal perspective over ten birth cohorts with a 3% discount rate.

Main Results:

  • Rotavirus vaccination is projected to prevent 4,000 deaths, 500,000 hospitalizations, and 3 million outpatient visits over ten years in the base scenario.
  • Cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted ranged from $58-$142 with Gavi subsidy.
  • Without subsidy, cost per DALY averted ranged from $615-$1514, with a vaccine price of $2.19 per dose.

Conclusions:

  • Rotavirus vaccination is highly cost-effective in Bangladesh, with discounted cost per DALY averted below GDP per capita in most scenarios.
  • The vaccination program demonstrates cost-effectiveness even in low-mortality settings without subsidies.
  • Estimated cost-effectiveness is conservative, excluding potential herd immunity benefits.
Abstract