Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint in EGFR-Mutated or ALK-Translocated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Olivier Bylicki1, Nicolas Paleiron2, Jacques Margery3

  • 1Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, 106, avenue Henri-Barbusse, 92140, Clamart, France. bylicki.olivier@yahoo.fr.

Targeted Oncology
|June 19, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show limited benefit for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR/ALK mutations. Current data suggests these patients do not benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeting PD-1/PD-L1, have transformed NSCLC treatment.
  • However, their efficacy is limited to a subset of patients.
  • Information on ICIs in EGFR/ALK-positive NSCLC remains scarce and contradictory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current data on the impact of ICIs in EGFR/ALK-positive NSCLC.
  • To consolidate findings from clinical trials and retrospective studies.
  • To address the limited benefit observed in this specific patient population.

Main Methods:

  • Review of Phase III randomized clinical trials evaluating ICIs versus chemotherapy in NSCLC.
  • Analysis of subgroup data from trials including EGFR/ALK-positive patients.
  • Inclusion of retrospective data and preclinical findings on PD-L1 expression.

Main Results:

  • Phase III trials included minimal EGFR/ALK-positive patients.
  • Subgroup analyses indicated no benefit from ICIs in these patients.
  • Retrospective data show short progression-free survival (1.2-2.1 months) with ICIs.
  • Preclinical data suggest lower PD-L1 expression in EGFR/ALK-positive NSCLC.

Conclusions:

  • EGFR/ALK-positive NSCLC patients show limited benefit from current ICIs.
  • Further research is needed to understand ICI efficacy in this subgroup.
  • Alternative treatment strategies may be required for EGFR/ALK-positive NSCLC.