Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026
Laminotomy for Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion Access and Injection in Swine
Published on: October 10, 2017
A Less-Invasive Retroperitoneal Lumbar Approach: Animal Feasibility Study and Primary Clinical Study
1*Department of Orthopaedics, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, P.R. China †Centre for Orthopaedic Research, School of Surgery, the University of Western Australia, WA, Australia ‡Department of Orthopaedics, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China.
Study Design:
Surgical approach development in an animal model, and a prospective study comparing clinical outcomes between novel and conventional approaches in thoracolumbar burst fracture fixation.
Objective:
To investigate the feasibility of a less-invasive retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine in a sheep model and to compare the clinical outcomes of anterior reconstruction in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures using novel and conventional approaches.
Summary Of Background Data:
The anterior retroperitoneal lumbar approach is well established for anterior lumbar surgical procedures in both humans and animal models. However, potential concerns include the increased risk of complications such as soft-tissue trauma, and extended periods of rehabilitation postoperatively.
Materials And Methods:
A less-invasive retroperitoneal approach was designed in a sheep model with minimal soft-tissue dissection to keep the abdominal and paravertebral muscles intact. Eight sheep underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion using this approach. In the clinical study, 48 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures underwent anterior decompression and reconstruction. The less-invasive approach and conventional approach were applied in 12 and 36 cases, respectively. The clinical outcomes during the minimum 12-month follow-up of the 2 groups were compared.
Results:
With the less-invasive approach, anterior lumbar interbody fusion was accomplished in all sheep, and no surgical complications were observed. In the clinical study, operation time, blood loss, and duration of hospitalization were comparable between 2 groups. Using the less-invasive approach decreased the length of incision, 3-day postoperative visual analogue scale score, postoperative independent standing, and narcotic-dependent duration. No surgical complications were observed in either group.
Conclusions:
Our results and early experience suggests that the less-invasive retroperitoneal approach is safe and effective for anterior lumbar surgery. Compared with the conventional approach, significantly better postoperative rehabilitation and abdominal muscle preservation were seen with this novel approach.
