Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Sandy Soil Improvement through Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation MICP by Immersion
Published on: September 12, 2019
Utilization of phosphogypsum and phosphate tailings for cemented paste backfill
Qiusong Chen1, Qinli Zhang2, Andy Fourie3
1School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China; School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, WA, Australia.
This study explores using phosphogypsum (PG) and phosphate tailings (PTS) for cemented paste backfill. Optimal results were achieved using Portland cement as a binder and CaO as an additive, yielding over 4 MPa UCS without gas generation.
Area of Science:
- Geotechnical Engineering
- Materials Science
- Environmental Engineering
Background:
- Phosphogypsum (PG) and phosphate tailings (PTS) are industrial byproducts requiring sustainable disposal solutions.
- Cemented paste backfill (CPB) is a common method for mine waste management.
- Investigating novel material combinations for CPB is crucial for resource utilization and environmental protection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility of using PG and PTS as aggregates in cemented paste backfill.
- To evaluate the impact of different binders (slags, Portland cement) and additives (CaO) on backfill performance.
- To analyze the influence of PG ageing time on backfill consolidation and strength.
Main Methods:
- Experimental preparation of CPB samples using various combinations of PG, PTS, slags, Portland cement, and CaO.
- Testing of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) after 7 and 28 days of curing.
- Analysis of generated gases (CO2, SO2, H2S) and microstructural characteristics using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).
Main Results:
- CPB with PG and PTS alone had low UCS (<1.0 MPa) and generated significant CO2 and SO2.
- Incorporating slags improved UCS threefold but increased gas generation (CO2, SO2, H2S).
- Adding CaO alone reduced UCS significantly, but with Portland cement and 2% CaO, UCS reached 4.44 MPa (28 days) with no gas generation. PG ageing beyond 4 days had negligible effect on UCS.
Conclusions:
- PG and PTS are viable aggregates for cemented paste backfill.
- Portland cement as a binder and CaO as an additive are effective in achieving desired backfill strength and preventing harmful gas emissions.
- This approach offers a sustainable method for managing PG and PTS, contributing to circular economy principles in mining.
More Related Videos
05:38Production and Analysis of Sporosarcina pasteurii Biocement Bricks Using Custom 3D-Printed Molds for Unconfined Compression Tests
Published on: March 7, 2025
11:14Two-way Valorization of Blast Furnace Slag: Synthesis of Precipitated Calcium Carbonate and Zeolitic Heavy Metal Adsorbent
Published on: February 21, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Types of Cement II
Pozzolans
Fly ash is...
Portland Cement
Soundness of Cement
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
The...