Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Cross-validation analysis for genetic evaluation models for ranking in endurance horses
S García-Ballesteros1, L Varona2, M Valera3
11Departamento de Producción Animal,Universidad Complutense de Madrid,Avda. Puerta de Hierro s/n,E-28040 Madrid,Spain.
The Thurstonian approach offers superior prediction accuracy for endurance horse breeding values compared to linear and threshold models. This method is recommended for routine genetic evaluations of horse ranking traits.
Area of Science:
- Animal Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
- Equine Science
Background:
- Traditional linear and threshold models are commonly used for estimating breeding values in competition horses.
- Recent research suggests Thurstonian models may offer improved prediction accuracy by accounting for race effects.
- Accurate genetic evaluation of ranking traits is crucial for selecting elite competition horses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive ability of linear, threshold, and Thurstonian approaches for the genetic evaluation of ranking traits in endurance horses.
- To identify the optimal genetic models incorporating various random effects (rider, rider-horse interaction, environmental effects) within each approach.
- To assess the heritability and prediction accuracy of different genetic models for endurance horse ranking.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a dataset of 4065 ranking records from 966 endurance horses and a pedigree of 8733 animals.
- Applied eight genetic models for each of the linear, threshold, and Thurstonian approaches, including systematic effects (gender, age, race) and random effects.
- Evaluated prediction ability using a cross-validation approach, calculating correlations between real and predicted racing performances.
Main Results:
- Thurstonian approaches achieved the highest average correlation (0.60) between real and predicted performances, followed by linear (0.58) and threshold (0.25).
- The best models included specific random effects: rider and rider-horse for threshold, rider and permanent environment for linear, and all random effects for Thurstonian.
- High correlations were observed between Thurstonian and threshold models' predicted breeding values (0.85-0.91), while linear and threshold showed lower correlations (0.51-0.65).
Conclusions:
- The Thurstonian approach demonstrates superior predictability for genetic evaluation of ranking traits in endurance horses.
- This method effectively accounts for race-specific competitive levels, leading to more accurate breeding value estimations.
- The Thurstonian approach is recommended for routine genetic evaluations in endurance horse breeding programs.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
09:35A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
Published on: August 16, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Pedigree Analysis
Heritability
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Multiple Allele Traits
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles,...